$LUMI

SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

Still inside the first 24 hours: updated every 15 minutes. Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($95). Measured 19 h ago.

How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

Trading apps

Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 19 h ago.

The 4 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 19.95% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 0 linked groups hold 0% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 6 coins we checked, and 0 of 5 with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day; members bought 10 launch blocks.

Coins they created: $Wojak, $FUN, $FĀFĀ, $anon, $LUMI, $LUMI

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

4 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet ApVfs5373Gge5YPR9m2w3feaA6m8BwryysAa3aJZoyb (from GeckoTerminal). We've checked 5 other coins from it:

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Money out$7,957 (83.3 SOL) taken out in the first 24 hours by 1 of the dev and launch-block wallets. That includes liquidity: 85.0 SOL added to the pool, 168.3 SOL taken back out. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 6 coins we checked, and 0 of 5 with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day; members bought 10 launch blocks. source
• The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; their 872 earlier coins with an outcome: 42 fell 80%+, 829 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @lightberry with 871 likes. The post names this coin. 37 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 3787 days before the coin launched. source
• Same ticker elsewhere26 other coins trade as $LUMI. The biggest is LUMI on Solana ($30.3K, first pool 2d ago). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 5 other coins we checked. Of the 4 with a 24 h outcome, 0 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Wallets with a winning record bought the launch4 launch-block buyers have a record in our checks: their earlier launch buys were worth 2x or more a day later. The best: 594 of 623 (2Wpe…p93t). source
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/lightberry/status/2116326790033781021 is also listed by 37 other coins we checked: $LUMI, $LUMI, $LUMI, $LUMI…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website lightberry.com is also listed by 34 other coins we checked: $LUMI, $LUMI, $LUMI, $LUMI…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.