$FUN

Solanagraduated 3d ago
Scanned 31 Oct 2026

20% of supply went to 4 launch-block wallets; mint and freeze revoked.

Price–– 24h
Market cap–
Liquidity–
Volume 24h–
Holders–
Top 10 hold–
Dev holds–
Launch block20%4 wallets

Promises vs the chain

What the X post promises, checked against what the chain shows

2 not seen yet
  • Not seen yet Buybacks…a few upgrades: • 100% of platform fees go to $FUN buybacks and burns. We keep 0%. • Built-in trading. Launch and trade in one place.…X post No buys by the dev side seen in the first 24 hours. See it ›
  • Not seen yet Token burns…• 100% of platform fees go to $FUN buybacks and burns. We keep 0%. • Built-in trading. Launch and trade in one place. •…X post No tokens at a burn address among the top holders. See it ›

Promises are read from the coin's own website and its linked X post. Each one is checked against our on-chain reads; "Not seen yet" can change as the coin gets older. Facts, not a verdict about the team.

Loading the chart…

    ▲ buy · ▼ sell · ● event. Markers show trades by wallets we know something about (D dev, LB launch-block buyer, C crew, K KOL, S smart money, W large trade, TG callout) and what our live watch flagged. Facts, not a verdict. Charts by TradingView.

    Holder concentration

    Top holders mapped by share

    No holder list yet: it's read during the scan.

    Deepest pools

    Top 5 by liquidity

    No pools found yet: the coin may still be on its launch curve.

    How we scanned the website

    tryfafa.xyz

    Screenshot of tryfafa.xyz
    1. 1Opened tryfafa.xyz in our sandboxed browser26 requests in 12.8s
    2. 2Read its code 6 scriptsweb3.js, Solana web3 / wallet adapter, Phantom
    3. 3Talks to 1 own host + 1 outside serviceGoogle Fonts
    4. 4Wallet code connects a walletweb3.js, Solana web3 / wallet adapter, Phantom · doesn't show this coin's address
    5. 5Tech claims none made

    Every finding with its source ›

    Over time

    Liquidity, holders and market cap

    Recording started: we read this coin every 10 minutes from now on, and the charts fill in over the next hour.

    Money out

    SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

    $4,111Taken out (44.6 SOL)
    1Of 4 wallets took out more than they put in
    0Linked groups that took money out
    129.6 / 85.0Liquidity taken out / added (SOL)
    GroupWalletsBoughtSoldLiquidity in / outNet
    ApVf…Zoyb (added the pool's liquidity)10.00 SOL0.00 SOL85.0 / 129.6+44.56 SOL · $4,111
    7oDF…kQ2A10.00 SOL0.00 SOL0.0 / 0.0+0.00 SOL · $0
    PYUx…k1iU10.00 SOL0.00 SOL0.0 / 0.0+0.00 SOL · $0
    2Wpe…p93t10.00 SOL0.00 SOL0.0 / 0.0+0.00 SOL · $0

    Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($92). Measured 17 h ago.

    Footprints

    How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

    3Wallets read (of 12)
    2Different trading apps or routes
    noneBiggest same-fee group (wallets · supply)
    0%Top-holder supply paid by wallets in this coin

    Trading apps

    App or routeWalletsSupply
    Through program cpam…1sGG20.0%
    Direct (no app fee seen)10.0%

    Where the top holders' money came from

    First funded byHoldersSupply
    Not traced1014.34%

    Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 17 h ago.

    The launch block, by who paid for it

    The 4 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 19.95% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 0 linked groups hold 0% of it.

    On its own: 19.95%On its own: 0.0%On its own: 0.0%On its own: 0.0%
    GroupWalletsShare boughtTaken out (24 h)
    ApVf…Zoyb on its own 119.95% +44.56 SOL · $4,111
    7oDF…kQ2A on its own sniper 10.0% +0.00 SOL · $0
    PYUx…k1iU on its own sniper 10.0% +0.00 SOL · $0
    2Wpe…p93t on its own sniper 10.0% +0.00 SOL · $0

    Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

    The team

    The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

    4Wallets in the team
    0Connected to the dev
    5%Earlier coins that fell 80%+
    95%Earlier coins that went 2x+
    2Wpe…p93t early buyer sniper 750 earlier coins: 31 fell 80%+, 643 2x+
    7oDF…kQ2A early buyer sniper 722 earlier coins: 13 fell 80%+, 397 2x+
    PYUx…k1iU early buyer sniper 153 earlier coins: 2 fell 80%+, 128 2x+
    ApVf…Zoyb early buyer · 19.9% 8 earlier coins: 0 fell 80%+, 8 2x+

    Money map

    Loading who funded whom…

    Arrows show money moving (first SOL a wallet received) and coins bought or held. Facts from the chain, not a verdict about anyone.

    The launch block

    4 wallets bought 19.9% of the supply in the same block the coin was created (or the next one). Many buyers there usually means a scripted, "bundled" launch.

    ApVf…Zoyb19.95%
    7oDF…kQ2A0.00%
    PYUx…k1iU0.00%
    2Wpe…p93t0.00%

    Repeat launch buyers

    4 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

    2Wpe…p93t750 other launches 11jJ… 1ydW… 21f3… 22H6…
    7oDF…kQ2A722 other launches 11jJ… 12QM… 141n… 14QG…
    PYUx…k1iU153 other launches 2DGo… 2Dap… 2KNv… 2LQA…
    ApVf…Zoyb8 other launches 8b7r… AzLZ… B1XM… Cmjy…

    At a glance

    • Mint & freezeRevoked
    • Bought in the launch block19.9% by 4 wallets
    • Socialssite X

    Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.

    Launch map

    The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

    Launch tape (log time from creation)

    Created Launch block 20% · 4 wallets · +0s Graduated +54s Our check $0 · +80s 24 h later $8.6K · +24h Now +3d

    Live activity

    Connecting to the live trades…

    What we're seeing

    • Waiting for trades…

    Latest trades

    Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)

    WalletBoughtSoldNetTrades
    Waiting for trades…

    Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.

    20% of supply went to 4 launch-block wallets; mint and freeze revoked.

    • Money out$4,111 (44.6 SOL) taken out in the first 24 hours by 1 of the dev and launch-block wallets. That includes liquidity: 85.0 SOL added to the pool, 129.6 SOL taken back out.
    • Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (CcSR…pump, GhoC…pMnz, 46Uw…H7UH).
    • Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive has never saved the site: it is probably as new as the coin.
    • Same ticker elsewhere26 other coins trade as $FUN. The biggest is FunPay on polygon ($183M, first pool 4mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant.

    Cross-checks

    What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

    • Money out$4,111 (44.6 SOL) taken out in the first 24 hours by 1 of the dev and launch-block wallets. That includes liquidity: 85.0 SOL added to the pool, 129.6 SOL taken back out. source
    • The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; their 925 earlier coins with an outcome: 44 fell 80%+, 880 went 2x+ within a day. source
    • The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @LaunchondotFUN (verified) with 265 likes. The post names this coin. 37 other coins we checked use the same post. source
    • Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (CcSR…pump, GhoC…pMnz, 46Uw…H7UH). source
    • Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive has never saved the site: it is probably as new as the coin.
    • Same ticker elsewhere26 other coins trade as $FUN. The biggest is FunPay on polygon ($183M, first pool 4mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. source
    • Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
    • Wallets with a winning record bought the launch4 launch-block buyers have a record in our checks: their earlier launch buys were worth 2x or more a day later. The best: 644 of 675 (2Wpe…p93t). source
    • Reused X postThe X post x.com/LaunchondotFUN/status/2116458740060954632 is also listed by 37 other coins we checked: $FUN, $FUN, $FUN, $FUN…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
    • Reused websiteThe website tryfafa.xyz is also listed by 29 other coins we checked: $发发, $发发, $发发, $发发…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

    The token

    Mint & freeze revoked

    • Mint new tokens: locked
    • Freeze wallets: locked
    • Change name, logo and links: locked
    Full token report

    The website

    The website makes none of the tech claims we check for.

    Full website report
    The story behind it

    @LaunchondotFUN verified · 265 likes · 150 replies

    Pumpfun stopped being FUN So we created a launchpad that is. Introducing .FUN Bringing launches back to @Raydium with a few upgrades: • 100% of platform fees go to $FUN buybacks and burns. We keep 0%. • Built-in trading. Launch and trade in one place. • Anti-vamp https://t.co/pagUHuy2a6

    The post names this coin. 37 other coins we checked use the same post.

    Track record of these signals

    How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

    Signal this coin hasFell 80%+ with itWithout itCoins
    Launch buyers that buy many launches40%56%1981
    • Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
    • "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.