$Qwen / Evil Qwen

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($92). Measured 10 h ago.

The 4 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 19.95% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 19.95% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 8 coins we checked; members bought 3 launch blocks.

Coins they created: $Shitcoin, $ILY, $minigang, $Evil Qwen, $Qwen, $maxxing, $Save Bow, $Hacchan

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

3 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Other coins in our records tied to this creator through the wallet that first funded it.

Creator wallet AnT9imgwtkomP8SmVUTagNvrPxCPCLxjGCxqNjyALhZN (from GeckoTerminal). 4 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

4 red

$Evil QwenTechThe team's earlier coins: 8 of 9 fell 80%+ within a day; the website backs 0 of its 1 tech claims with its own 32 $0at scan 9d ago $maxxingTechThe team's earlier coins: 4 of 5 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address; top 10 hol 26 $0at scan 9d ago $Save Bow BowTechThe team's earlier coins: 11 of 12 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 32 $0at scan 9d ago $Hacchan HacchancoinTechThe team's earlier coins: 12 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 32 $0at scan 9d ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 26 Oct 2026.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #gf7bde, has 5 of its 53 wallets here: 0.24% held at our check. 34 of the 81 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Money outThe dev and 3 launch-block wallets put in more SOL than they took out in the first 24 hours. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 8 coins we checked; members bought 3 launch blocks. source
• The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; their 15 earlier coins with an outcome: 14 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @_lyraaaa_ (verified) with 22,398 likes. The post names this coin. 4 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Code linkedThe site links to https://github.com/security/advanced-security; its check is queued.
• Same ticker elsewhere3 other coins trade as $Qwen. None of them has a pool with real liquidity behind its price. source
• Linked launches2 other coins in our records connect to this creator through funding: $ILY (creator funded by this creator), $minigang (creator funded by this creator).
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 4 other coins we checked.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/_lyraaaa_/status/2113833330429083662 is also listed by 4 other coins we checked: $Evil Qwen, $Evil Qwen, $Evil Qwen, $Evil Qwen. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.