$maxxing

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; 1 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 0%; their 214 earlier coins with an outcome: 17 fell 80%+, 197 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @zukiweb3. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 10 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
• Same ticker elsewhere28 other coins trade as $maxxing. The biggest is maxxing on Solana ($412K, first pool 10mo ago). source
• Linked launches2 other coins in our records connect to this creator through funding: $ILY (creator funded by this creator), $minigang (creator funded by this creator).
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 4 other coins we checked. Of the 2 with a 24 h outcome, 0 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Wallets with a winning record bought the launch4 launch-block buyers have a record in our checks: their earlier launch buys were worth 2x or more a day later. The best: 129 of 136 (7oDF…kQ2A). source
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/zukiweb3/status/2114575925228486660 is also listed by 10 other coins we checked: $MAXXING, $maxxing, $maxxing, $maxxing…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website knowyourmeme.com is also listed by 37 other coins we checked: $:3, $:3, $Jose, $smugler…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Groups of wallets that keep buying launch blocks together, across coins we checked. A crew is a buying pattern; it doesn't say who runs it.

4 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Other coins in our records tied to this creator through the wallet that first funded it.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 79.3%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

Creator wallet AnT9imgwtkomP8SmVUTagNvrPxCPCLxjGCxqNjyALhZN (from GeckoTerminal). We've checked 4 other coins from it:

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.