$HYPERCAT

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The 4 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 19.95% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 19.95% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 12 coins we checked; members bought 7 launch blocks.

Coins they created: $MAX, $PODCAT, $SPERM, $Kleinfrog, $Kleinfrog, $HERMIT, $HYPERCAT, $HYPERCAT, $HYPERCAT, $MAKERS, $Stonker, $OpenBot

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

3 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet Dx8bqiyKV3Vo3TxTqWNEB9HSYNpuKCA77zm551pFk9sR (from GeckoTerminal). 11 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

1 green2 yellow8 red0 of 1 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$MAX Max LeverageTechSerial launcher: 11 other coins from this dev; website doesn't show this token's address; top 10 hold 100% 26 $0at scan 5d ago $PODCATTechDev not checked yet; tech not tested yet; top 10 hold 96% 31 $0at scan 5d ago $SPERM spermcoinNarrativeDev not checked yet; narrative coin, nothing to test 63 $0at scan 5d ago $Kleinfrog Kleinfrog CoinTechSerial launcher: 11 other coins from this dev; website doesn't show this token's address 80 +55%a day after scan 6d ago $Kleinfrog Kleinfrog CoinTechThe dev holds 90%; tech not tested yet 25 $8.5Kat scan 6d ago $HERMITTechThe team's earlier coins: 5 of 7 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address; top 10 hol 26 $0at scan 6d ago $HYPERCATTechThe team's earlier coins: 5 of 7 fell 80%+ within a day; on-chain claim, no wallet code 30 $0at scan 6d ago $HYPERCATTechThe team's earlier coins: 5 of 7 fell 80%+ within a day; on-chain claim, no wallet code; top 10 hold 99% 26 $0at scan 6d ago $MAKERSTechSerial launcher: 11 other coins from this dev; on-chain claim, no wallet code 63 $0at scan 6d ago $StonkerVampThe team's earlier coins: 5 of 7 fell 80%+ within a day; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 28 $0at scan 6d ago $OpenBotTechThe team's earlier coins: 5 of 7 fell 80%+ within a day; the website backs 0 of its 1 tech claims with its own 32 $0at scan 6d ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 28 Oct 2026.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin2 known groups of wallets are in this coin. The largest, holder guild #g27942, has 7 of its 10 wallets here: 0.21% held at our check. 1 of the 3 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 12 coins we checked; members bought 7 launch blocks. source
• The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; their 7 earlier coins with an outcome: 5 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @xulian_hl (verified) with 72 likes. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 6 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (HjVG…MKRS). source
• On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims on-chain / smart contracts, but its code has no wallet or contract calls. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive has never saved the site: it is probably as new as the coin.
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 11 other coins we checked. Of the 1 with a 24 h outcome, 0 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/xulian_hl/status/2043524525497757861 is also listed by 6 other coins we checked: $HYPERCAT, $HYPERCAT, $HYPERCAT, $HYPERCAT…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website pumpmakers.fun is also listed by 11 other coins we checked: $MAKERS, $MAKERS, $MAKERS, $MAKERS…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.