$Punjimogui / The Nietzschean Punjimoguin

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 1 coin we checked.

Coins they created: $Punjimogui

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet Fb4qn4k7uFipRMAXGpkUeeHGUAQCeL5zWrZhFQivYdRv (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 5 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 0.22%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #g544e4, has 3 of its 55 wallets here: 1.0% held at our check. 54 of the 118 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 1 coin we checked. source
• The teamThe dev and 1 early buyer/holder wallet; 1 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 0%. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @texashedge17154 with 28 likes. It was posted 10 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 2 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (3NJC…pump, AAPL…LnB8, XsbE…JzJp). source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 59 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $245 market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $2) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere19 other coins trade as $Punjimogui. None of them has real liquidity and trading behind its price. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/texashedge17154/status/2118439475957174600 is also listed by 2 other coins we checked: $Punjimoguin, $Punjimogui. 1 of them came earlier. source
• Reused websiteThe website otcdesks.cash is also listed by 200 other coins we checked: $KINK, $A71, $Teddy ×3, $CAPE…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.