$DEFAULT / Default PFP

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each; some wallets had more). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($78). Measured 1 h ago.

How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

Trading apps

Same fee settings

Where the top holders' money came from

Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 6 h ago.

The 5 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 15.36% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 4.5% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Groups of wallets that keep buying launch blocks together, across coins we checked. A crew is a buying pattern; it doesn't say who runs it.

3 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh (from GeckoTerminal). 29 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

29 red7 of 14 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$SinuNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; no X account, Telegram or website linked 34 1d ago $vibeshiftTechDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; 8% held by wallets one source paid; tech not tested yet 23 $64.0Kat scan 2d ago $GREY Grey MarketTechSerial launcher: 28 other coins from this dev; only 32% of the supply in the pool 27 -89%a day after scan 3d ago $GTA4 GTA IVTechDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; tech not tested yet 27 3d ago $MEOWTechDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; website age vs launch 28 4d ago $HWAN hwan.ioTechDev's earlier coins: 7 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; website age vs launch 30 -34%a day after scan 4d ago $AI Artificial InuVampDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 31 4d ago $Alice The Nvidia SpyVampWe couldn't read the launch block yet, so the launch can't count as c…; serial launcher: 29 other coins from t 24 -89%a day after scan 5d ago $SURPLUSVampDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; the X account was made around the coin's launch 22 5d ago $SEAL SealpadTechDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; tech not tested yet 15 $18.9Kat scan 5d ago $p402TechDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; tech not tested yet 24 5d ago $TAOLFNarrativeWe couldn't read the launch block yet, so the launch can't count as c…; serial launcher: 29 other coins from t 26 -89%a day after scan 5d ago $APUTechSerial launcher: 29 other coins from this dev; the website backs 1 of its 3 tech claims with its own code 33 -93%a day after scan 6d ago $TTT Tung Tung Tung SahurTechSerial launcher: 29 other coins from this dev; tech not tested yet 32 -84%a day after scan 6d ago $UNISONNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; the X account was made around the coin's launch 21 6d ago $TAOLFNarrativeSerial launcher: 29 other coins from this dev; a known launch crew bought in; the same X post is linked by 1 o 17 -83%a day after scan 6d ago $Jose Be Like JoséNarrativeWe couldn't read the launch block yet, so the launch can't count as c…; dev's earlier coins: 7 of 13 fell 80%+ 38 -48%a day after scan 6d ago $SQUALLTechDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; the site backs 1 of 1 tech claims with its own code 36 6d ago $PROPFUNTechDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; only 22% of the supply in the pool; website doesn't show 24 6d ago $CHROME Chrome CatNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; a narrative coin; its X account has 9,113 followers 31 7d ago $FI Finance InuTechWe couldn't read the launch block yet, so the launch can't count as c…; serial launcher: 29 other coins from t 27 -86%a day after scan 7d ago $WABITechDev's earlier coins: 7 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; the website backs 0 of its 4 tech claims with its own cod 28 -78%a day after scan 8d ago $sssdfgNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 8 other coins we've seen 23 8d ago $PIRATE Pirate Shop TokenVampDev's earlier coins: 7 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; only 21% of the supply in the pool; a narrative coin; its 24 +91%a day after scan 9d ago $PHILNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 3 other coins we've seen 37 9d ago $OMNIBUSTechDev's earlier coins: 7 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; website age vs launch 26 9d ago $higher fuck you higherNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 7 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; the X account was made around the coin's launch 38 -34%a day after scan 9d ago $HIGH higher.funTechWe couldn't read the launch block yet, so the launch can't count as c…; dev's earlier coins: 7 of 13 fell 80%+ 33 -61%a day after scan 10d ago $FLUKENarrativeDev's earlier coins: 7 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X account is linked by 7 other coins we've seen 35 +21%a day after scan 14d ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 9 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, launch crew #1cc6b0, has 2 of its 803 wallets here: 4.5% bought in the launch block. 527 of the 671 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Same fee settings3 wallets holding 4.98% paid the exact same priority fee: usually one setup running several wallets. source
• Money out$937 (12.0 SOL) taken out in the first 24 hours by 4 of the dev and launch-block wallets, in 1 linked group. source
• The teamThe dev and 5 early buyer/holder wallets; 2 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 4.5%; their 32 earlier coins with an outcome: 19 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 24 years (8,754 days) before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $22.1K, 27.7% of the $79.6K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $796) would get roughly 6.7% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere19 other coins trade as $DEFAULT. None of them has real liquidity and trading behind its price. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 29 other coins we checked. Of the 14 with a 24 h outcome, 7 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Reused websiteThe website t.co is also listed by 117 other coins we checked: $Sonny ×15, $TikTok US ×2, $RIBBIT ×2, $bobifomo ×4…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Known address: top holder #4's funderThe top holder #4's funder 8DfH…m8hU is Binance (proof-of-reserves wallet). Source: binance-por. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.