$SQUALL

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The 7 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 19.11% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 3 linked groups hold 19.11% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Groups of wallets that keep buying launch blocks together, across coins we checked. A crew is a buying pattern; it doesn't say who runs it.

2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet WLHv2UAZm6z4KyaaELi5pjdbJh6RESMva1Rnn8pJVVh (from GeckoTerminal). 11 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

1 yellow10 red1 of 5 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$Jose Be Like JoséTechSerial launcher: 11 other coins from this dev; only 12% of the supply in the pool; website doesn't show this t 26 $733Kat scan 11m ago $PROPFUNTechSerial launcher: 10 other coins from this dev; only 22% of the supply in the pool; tech not tested yet 36 6h ago $CHROME Chrome CatTechSerial launcher: 10 other coins from this dev; website doesn't show this token's address 31 1d ago $FI Finance InuTechSerial launcher: 10 other coins from this dev; only 20% of the supply in the pool; website doesn't show this t 29 -86%a day after scan 1d ago $WABITechSerial launcher: 8 other coins from this dev; only 29% of the supply in the pool; tech not tested yet 36 +58%a day after scan 1d ago $sssdfgTechReused website, a relaunch pattern; a known launch crew bought in; website doesn't show this token's address 29 1d ago $PIRATE Pirate Shop TokenVampReused X account, a relaunch pattern; only 21% of the supply in the pool; copies the ticker of an older, bigge 29 +91%a day after scan 2d ago $PHILNarrativeSerial launcher: 8 other coins from this dev; only 3 holders; the same X post is linked by 2 other coins we've 35 2d ago $OMNIBUSTech7 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 16.7%; a known launch crew bought in; website age vs launch 24 3d ago $HIGH higher.funTechThe dev held 5.0% at our scan; only 7% of the supply in the pool; tech not tested yet 31 -61%a day after scan 4d ago $FLUKETechSerial launcher: 10 other coins from this dev; website age vs launch 63 +21%a day after scan 8d ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 1 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet. Linked buyers took 14.22% of the supply.

• 3 launch buyers (9.12% of supply) were first funded by 8DfH…m8hU.
• 2 launch buyers (5.1% of supply) were first funded by BmFd…ymy6.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, launch crew #1cc6b0, has 2 of its 440 wallets here: 4.89% bought in the launch block. 240 of the 283 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• The teamThe dev and 7 early buyer/holder wallets; 2 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 4.9%; their 11 earlier coins with an outcome: 6 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• Website shows this token's addressThe token's address appears on its website or in the site's code. source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive had no saved copy of the site (asked 2 h ago): it is probably as new as the coin.
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $4.8K, 141.9% of the $3.4K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $34) would get roughly 1.4% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere23 other coins trade as $SQUALL. The biggest is Squall on arc ($13.6K, first pool 1h ago). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 11 other coins we checked. Of the 5 with a 24 h outcome, 1 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Known address: launch buyer's funderThe launch buyer's funder 8DfH…m8hU is Binance (proof-of-reserves wallet). Source: binance-por. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.