$COIN / Insert Coin to play

How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

Trading apps

Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 03 Nov 2026.

The 3 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 100.0% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 100.0% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet ADmy8newfR3nY1uuAoFT3zjXYKQ7eM5qmcCTHFHYyffb (from GeckoTerminal). 12 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

6 yellow6 red3 of 3 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$COGENarrativeDev's earlier coins: 2 of 2 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 4 other coins we've seen 39 -100%a day after scan 10d ago $COGENarrativeDev's earlier coins: 2 of 2 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 4 other coins we've seen 39 -100%a day after scan 10d ago $COGENarrativeDev's earlier coins: 2 of 2 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 4 other coins we've seen 33 -100%a day after scan 10d ago $COIN Insert Coin to playTechDev's earlier coins: 3 of 3 fell 80%+ within a day; aI claim, no AI calls seen 34 $20.1Kat scan 11d ago $COIN Insert Coin to playTechThe dev sold out, nothing against it on record; tech not tested yet 65 $16.1Kat scan 11d ago $COIN Insert Coin to playTechThe dev sold out, nothing against it on record; tech not tested yet 65 $15.5Kat scan 11d ago $COIN Insert Coin to playTechThe dev sold out, nothing against it on record; tech not tested yet 65 $17.0Kat scan 11d ago $YMB You Missed BitchesTechThe dev sold out, nothing against it on record; tech not tested yet 65 $18.5Kat scan 11d ago $YMB You Missed BitchesTechThe dev holds 92%; aI claim, no AI calls seen 18 $17.1Kat scan 11d ago $BTJC Big Titty Jak CoinTechThe dev sold out, nothing against it on record; tech not tested yet; top 10 hold 100% 27 $16.5Kat scan 11d ago $BTJC Big Titty Jak CoinTechThe dev sold out, nothing against it on record; tech not tested yet 65 $16.8Kat scan 11d ago $CATE CatecoinTechThe dev sold out, nothing against it on record; tech not tested yet 65 $19.1Kat scan 11d ago

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; their 3 earlier coins with an outcome: 3 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @pxnkness (verified) with 47 likes. The post names this coin. 53 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 12 other coins we checked. Of the 3 with a 24 h outcome, 3 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/pxnkness/status/2112442384449441806 is also listed by 53 other coins we checked: $DCT, $DCT, $DCT, $DCT…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website p0z.app is also listed by 35 other coins we checked: $p0z, $p0z, $p0z, $CATE…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.