$p0z
p0z company

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• The teamThe dev and 0 early buyer/holder wallets. source
• AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
• Same ticker elsewhere1 other coin trades as $p0z. The biggest is p0z company on Solana ($2.6K, first pool 13d ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Reused X accountThe X account @p0zcompany is also listed by 2 other coins we checked: $p0z, $p0z. source
• Reused websiteThe website p0z.app is also listed by 35 other coins we checked: $p0z, $p0z, $CATE, $BTJC…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.