$STARMIND

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

Trading apps

Same fee settings

Where the top holders' money came from

The dev was first funded by Ch5i…6Bke: a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot).

Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 10 h ago.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet AqVXtGYqXwaQYoUHt93fMmZV7VRjNfwyvhUeAGGxXMrK (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 15 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 1 coin on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 1 of them.
• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #ga79d0, has 3 of its 8 wallets here: 5.0% held at our check. 16 of the 16 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Same fee settings2 wallets holding 3.42% paid the exact same priority fee: usually one setup running several wallets. source
• Tokens handed out4 wallets holding 7.73% didn't buy: their first tokens were sent by one wallet (AgmL…zN51). source
• The teamOnly the dev wallet: no early buyer or holder wallets found with it. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @gheezorr (verified) with 15 likes. It was posted 14 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $3.1K, 96.6% of the $3.3K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $33) would get roughly 2.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere28 other coins trade as $STARMIND. The biggest is Starmind on Robinhood Chain ($140K, first pool 14h ago). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Known address: creator's first funderThe creator's first funder Ch5i…6Bke is Pump Fun. Source: rugcheck.

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.