$e/acc / Effective Accelerationism

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

Trading apps

Where the top holders' money came from

The dev was first funded by 8kzw…jdnN: a personal wallet.

Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 29 h ago.

The dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 1 coin we checked.

Coins they created: $e/acc

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet CTVsrsPGd7BuY6yQQ7G6vQ5T1C32ZMWwBT7wYB3fYukR (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 29 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 1 coin on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 1 of them.
• Cabals in this coin3 known groups of wallets are in this coin. The largest, launch crew #1cc6b0, has 8 of its 492 wallets here: 88.06% held at our check. 275 of the 338 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 1 coin we checked. source
• The teamOnly the dev wallet: no early buyer or holder wallets found with it. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @beffjezos (verified) with 1,669 likes. It was posted 43 days before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 4 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (0x0a…37e3, 0xf2…0b65, 0xeb…88e4). source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 53 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $62, 3.9% of the $1.6K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $16) would get roughly 33.7% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere1 other coin trades as $e/acc. The biggest is e/acc on elysium ($9.9M, first pool 4d ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. An older coin with the same name (8Gsn…pump) had its pool go from $30.0K to $64 1d ago. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/beffjezos/status/2103593870189858971 is also listed by 4 other coins we checked: $e/acc ×4. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website usepaid.app is also listed by 200 other coins we checked: $PAID ×3, $Hugo, $DICKBUTTIFIER, $DICKBUTIFI…. It most likely belongs to $PAID, a far bigger coin; this coin is using it. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.