$ROBINCAT

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet DV2tvsB7sR84oFWdNLJwc9TFKNZv6HW6Nm4Qy5XmEAGp (from GeckoTerminal). 71 other coins from it in our records (newest 30 listed). It is also named for large coins ($AGC, $FAGENT): one person rarely launches several, so this is most likely a shared deployer or GeckoTerminal's guess, and the list isn't counted as this dev's record: Open the wallet ›

9 green10 yellow30 red28 of 38 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$BQC BBQCoinTech1 early wallet is connected to the dev; 6% held by wallets one source paid; tech not tested yet 29 $22.5Kat scan 5h ago $GLITCH Infinite Money GlitchTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; the pool is empty; website names another $GLITCH 37 $20.9Kat scan 7h ago $ROBINCATTech2 early wallets are connected to the dev; the pool is empty; website doesn't show this token's address 33 $20.2Kat scan 18h ago $MicroduckTechThe dev held 89% at our scan; on-chain claim, no wallet code 32 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $MicroduckTechThe dev held 92% at our scan; on-chain claim, no wallet code 30 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $DiamondNarrative3 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 0%; 8% held by wallets one source paid 35 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $DiamondNarrative5 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 0%; 8% held by wallets one source paid 35 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $DatacenterTech3 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 0%; the pool is empty; website doesn't show this token's add 35 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $DatacenterTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; website doesn't show this token's address 87 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $PVZ Plants vs. ZombiesTechReused website, a relaunch pattern; 9% held by wallets one source paid; website doesn't show this token's addr 29 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $bracketTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; the pool is empty; website doesn't show this token's address 35 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $Redflag China's Red FlagTechReused website, a relaunch pattern; the website backs 0 of its 1 tech claims with its own code 22 $13.8Kat scan 1d ago $MicroduckTechReused X account, a relaunch pattern; the pool is empty; on-chain claim, no wallet code 34 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $MicroduckTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; 9% held by wallets one source paid; tech not tested yet 36 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $MicroduckTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; 9% held by wallets one source paid; tech not tested yet 36 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $MicroduckTech6 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 0%; 10% held by wallets one source paid 23 1d ago $眉眉 meimeiVampReused X account, a relaunch pattern; 11% held by wallets one source paid; copies the ticker of an older, bigg 27 $16.4Kat scan 2d ago $RubbishTechReused website, a relaunch pattern; website doesn't show this token's address 84 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $Claude AI ClaudeTechReused X account, a relaunch pattern; website doesn't show this token's address 84 -100%a day after scan 3d ago $AGC Agentic CoinVampThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; top 10 hold 100%; narrative coin, nothing to test 27 4d ago $AGC Agentic CoinVampThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; top 10 hold 100%; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a 26 4d ago $AGC Agentic CoinNarrativeNothing on record against the dev; narrative coin, nothing to test 65 -100%a day after scan 4d ago $Claude Claude AiTechReused X account, a relaunch pattern; the AI agent saw none of 3 claimed features working 80 -100%a day after scan 4d ago $FAGENTTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; top 10 hold 100%; website names another $FAGENT 31 4d ago $FAGENTTechThe dev held 89% at our scan; website names another $FAGENT 25 -100%a day after scan 4d ago $FAGENTTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; website names another $FAGENT 64 +683%a day after scan 4d ago $FAGENTTech6 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 0%; 9% held by wallets one source paid; website names anothe 34 -79%a day after scan 5d ago $FAGENTTechNothing on record against the dev; only 13 holders; website names another $FAGENT 35 -100%a day after scan 5d ago $FAGENTTechNothing on record against the dev; website names another $FAGENT 78 6d ago $FAGENTTechNothing on record against the dev; website names another $FAGENT 65 $16at scan 6d ago

Showing the newest 30 of 49.

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 13 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #gd0127, has 10 of its 60 wallets here: 7.8% held at our check. 37 of the 68 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• The teamOnly the dev wallet: no early buyer or holder wallets found with it. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (0xde…79cc). source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 22 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $38.2K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $382) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThe address named as this coin's creator is also named for 71 other coins we checked, large ones among them ($AGC, $FAGENT). One person rarely launches several big coins, so it is most likely a shared deployer or a data source's guess: not counted as a record.
• Reused X accountThe X account @robincat_coin is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $ROBINCAT. 1 of them came earlier. source
• Reused Telegram groupThe Telegram group t.me/RobincatCoin is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $ROBINCAT. 1 of them came earlier. source
• Reused websiteThe website robincat.club is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $ROBINCAT. 1 of them came earlier. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.