$Diamond

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet DV2tvsB7sR84oFWdNLJwc9TFKNZv6HW6Nm4Qy5XmEAGp (from GeckoTerminal). 67 other coins from it in our records (newest 30 listed). It is also named for large coins ($AGC, $FAGENT): one person rarely launches several, so this is most likely a shared deployer or GeckoTerminal's guess, and the list isn't counted as this dev's record: Open the wallet ›

13 green12 yellow24 red19 of 31 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$MicroduckTechThe dev held 89% at our scan; on-chain claim, no wallet code 32 $23.1Kat scan 4h ago $MicroduckTechThe dev held 92% at our scan; on-chain claim, no wallet code 30 $20.4Kat scan 4h ago $DiamondNarrative3 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 0%; 8% held by wallets one source paid 31 $36.5Kat scan 5h ago $DatacenterTech3 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 0%; the pool is empty; website doesn't show this token's add 35 $18.6Kat scan 7h ago $DatacenterTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; tech not tested yet 85 $20.1Kat scan 8h ago $PVZ Plants vs. ZombiesTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; 9% held by wallets one source paid; tech not tested yet 35 $18.1Kat scan 10h ago $bracketTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; tech not tested yet 85 $14.9Kat scan 11h ago $Redflag China's Red FlagTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; the website backs 0 of its 1 tech claims with its own code 45 $13.8Kat scan 15h ago $MicroduckTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; tech not tested yet 85 $19.6Kat scan 19h ago $MicroduckTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; 9% held by wallets one source paid; tech not tested yet 36 $24.1Kat scan 21h ago $MicroduckTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; 9% held by wallets one source paid; tech not tested yet 36 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $MicroduckTech6 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 0%; 10% held by wallets one source paid 23 1d ago $眉眉 meimeiVampThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; 11% held by wallets one source paid; the same X account is linke 33 $16.4Kat scan 1d ago $RubbishTechReused website, a relaunch pattern; the pool is empty; website doesn't show this token's address 35 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $Claude AI ClaudeTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; tech not tested yet 85 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $AGC Agentic CoinVampThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; top 10 hold 100%; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a 26 3d ago $AGC Agentic CoinVampThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; top 10 hold 100%; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a 26 3d ago $AGC Agentic CoinNarrativeNothing on record against the dev; narrative coin, nothing to test 65 -100%a day after scan 3d ago $Claude Claude AiTechReused X account, a relaunch pattern; the AI agent saw none of 3 claimed features working 80 -100%a day after scan 3d ago $FAGENTTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; top 10 hold 100%; website names another $FAGENT 31 3d ago $FAGENTTechThe dev held 89% at our scan; website names another $FAGENT 25 -100%a day after scan 3d ago $FAGENTTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; tech not tested yet 64 +683%a day after scan 3d ago $FAGENTTechDev not checked yet; 9% held by wallets one source paid; tech not tested yet 36 -79%a day after scan 4d ago $FAGENTTechNothing on record against the dev; only 13 holders; website names another $FAGENT 35 -100%a day after scan 5d ago $FAGENTTechNothing on record against the dev; website names another $FAGENT 78 5d ago $FAGENTTechNothing on record against the dev; website names another $FAGENT 65 $16at scan 5d ago $FAGENTTechNothing on record against the dev; website names another $FAGENT 64 -63%a day after scan 5d ago $SAFU SAFU FundVampDev not checked yet; 8% held by wallets one source paid; the same X post is linked by 20 other coins we've see 29 -100%a day after scan 5d ago $SAFU SAFU FundVamp4 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 0%; 7% held by wallets one source paid 24 -100%a day after scan 6d ago $Brilliant A Glorious LifeNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 22 of 41 fell 80%+ within a day; no X account, Telegram or website linked 31 -100%a day after scan 6d ago

Showing the newest 30 of 49.

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 5 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 7.83%. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #gd0127, has 10 of its 60 wallets here: 9.08% held at our check. 28 of the 59 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• The teamThe dev and 5 early buyer/holder wallets; 5 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 0%. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @5iZedup (verified) with 290 likes. It was posted 16 h before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 23 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $5 market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $0) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere27 other coins trade as $Diamond. The biggest is Diamond on Solana ($768K, first pool 21h ago). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThe address named as this coin's creator is also named for 67 other coins we checked, large ones among them ($AGC, $FAGENT). One person rarely launches several big coins, so it is most likely a shared deployer or a data source's guess: not counted as a record.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/5izedup/status/2118500708924182553 is also listed by 23 other coins we checked: $DIAMOND, $Diamond ×22. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.