$Max / Max coin

The 2 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 20.05% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 20.05% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 5 linked wallets; together they created 2 coins we checked.

Coins they created: $Max, $Huang

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

1 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Other coins in our records tied to this creator through the wallet that first funded it.

Creator wallet 8XmoxpmKy3c5Dhn9hfpbXFj8c8FApYS7zmBmCqtwHoUW (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 40 min ago.

• Dev-linked<0.1%1 wallet

Held right now by the top 20 holders, by tag. Sniper, bundler and side-wallet tags come from every launch we've read, not this coin alone.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 0.01%. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 5 linked wallets; together they created 2 coins we checked. source
• The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; 1 connected to the dev (funding or crew); 1189 earlier coins together, outcomes still coming in. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (4cEy…ozer, KT95…He8K, GGfe…aL5c). source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive had no saved copy of the site (asked 10 min ago): it is probably as new as the coin.
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $55.8K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $558) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Linked launches1 other coin in our records connects to this creator through funding: $Huang (launched by this creator's funder).
• Reused X accountThe X account @_maxcoin is also listed by 13 other coins we checked: $Max ×12, $Max Dog. It most likely belongs to $Max, a far bigger coin; this coin is using it. source
• Reused websiteThe website maxmusk.fun is also listed by 9 other coins we checked: $Max ×9. It most likely belongs to $Max, a far bigger coin; this coin is using it. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.