$FUN
Trading for 3d; 20% of supply went to 3 launch-block wallets; mint and freeze revoked.
Promises vs the chain
What the X post promises, checked against what the chain shows
2 not seen yet- Not seen yet
Buybacks
…a few upgrades: • 100% of platform fees go to $FUN buybacks and burns. We keep 0%. • Built-in trading. Launch and trade in one place.…
X post No buys by the dev side seen in the first 24 hours. See it › - Not seen yet
Token burns
…• 100% of platform fees go to $FUN buybacks and burns. We keep 0%. • Built-in trading. Launch and trade in one place. •…
X post No tokens at a burn address among the top holders. See it ›
Promises are read from the coin's own website and its linked X post. Each one is checked against our on-chain reads; "Not seen yet" can change as the coin gets older. Facts, not a verdict about the team.
▲ buy · ▼ sell · ● event. Markers show trades by wallets we know something about (D dev, LB launch-block buyer, C crew, K KOL, S smart money, W large trade, TG callout) and what our live watch flagged. Facts, not a verdict. Charts by TradingView.
Holder concentration
Top holders mapped by share
No holder list yet: it's read during the scan.
Deepest pools
Top 1 by liquidity
Bar = share of all liquidity across the coin's pools. Pools from DexScreener.
How we scanned the website
launchon.fun
- 1Opened launchon.fun in our sandboxed browser24 requests in 12.6s
- 2Read its code 17 scriptsReact, Supabase client, Phantom
- 3Talks to 1 own host, nothing outside–
- 4Wallet code connects a walletPhantom · doesn't show this coin's address
- 5Tech claims 1 of 1 backed by its own code ✓ Wallet connection
Over time
Liquidity, holders and market cap
Recording started: we read this coin every 10 minutes from now on, and the charts fill in over the next hour.
Money out
SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.
| Group | Wallets | Bought | Sold | Liquidity in / out | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5P8C…Kx9s (added the pool's liquidity) | 1 | 0.00 SOL | 0.00 SOL | 87.0 / 0.0 | -87.00 SOL · $-8,299 |
| 2Wpe…p93t | 1 | 0.00 SOL | 0.00 SOL | 0.0 / 0.0 | +0.00 SOL · $0 |
| GQhp…bWdJ | 1 | 0.00 SOL | 0.00 SOL | 0.0 / 0.0 | +0.00 SOL · $0 |
Still inside the first 24 hours: updated every 15 minutes. Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($95). Measured 31 Oct 2026.
The launch block, by who paid for it
The 3 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 19.9% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 0 linked groups hold 0% of it.
| Group | Wallets | Share bought | Taken out (24 h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5P8C…Kx9s on its own | 1 | 19.9% | -87.00 SOL · $-8,299 |
| 2Wpe…p93t on its own sniper | 1 | 0.0% | +0.00 SOL · $0 |
| GQhp…bWdJ on its own sniper | 1 | 0.0% | +0.00 SOL · $0 |
Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.
The dev's linked wallets 2
The dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 1 coin we checked; members bought 1 launch block.
| 5P8C…Kx9s | this wallet | created 1 |
| 5P7B…52Va | funded 5P8C…Kx9s |
Coins they created: $FUN
Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.
The team
The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.
| 5P8C…Kx9s | dev | no earlier coins seen | |
| 2Wpe…p93t | early buyer sniper | 756 earlier coins: 5 fell 80%+, 0 2x+ | |
| GQhp…bWdJ | early buyer sniper | 136 earlier coins: 1 fell 80%+, 0 2x+ |
Money map
Loading who funded whom…Arrows show money moving (first SOL a wallet received) and coins bought or held. Facts from the chain, not a verdict about anyone.
Repeat launch buyers
2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.
| 2Wpe…p93t | 756 other launches | 11jJ… 1ydW… 21f3… 22H6… |
| GQhp…bWdJ | 136 other launches | 141n… 2JGr… 2MMw… 2Vzp… |
The creator's other coins
Creator wallet 5P8CpCAq9LGM2a1ZRAexAkccsoPTZqVgFZjfTP2sKx9s (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›
At a glance
- Mint & freezeRevoked
- Bought in the launch block19.9% by 3 wallets
- Socialssite X
Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.
Launch map
The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.
Launch tape (log time from creation)
Live activity
What we're seeing
- Waiting for trades…
Latest trades
Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)
| Wallet | Bought | Sold | Net | Trades | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for trades… | |||||
Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.
Trading for 3d; 20% of supply went to 3 launch-block wallets; mint and freeze revoked.
- The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; their 5 earlier coins with an outcome: 5 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day.
- Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (FDSG…pump, umd3…Phcy, R19j…dkMH).
- Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive has never saved the site: it is probably as new as the coin.
- Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $10.5K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $105) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool).
- Same ticker elsewhere23 other coins trade as $FUN. The biggest is FunPay on polygon ($179M, first pool 4mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant.
Cross-checks
What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.
- Money outThe dev and 2 launch-block wallets put in more SOL than they took out in the first 24 hours. That includes liquidity: 87.0 SOL added to the pool, 0.0 SOL taken back out. source
- Linked walletsThe dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 1 coin we checked; members bought 1 launch block. source
- The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; their 5 earlier coins with an outcome: 5 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
- The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @LaunchondotFUN (verified) with 263 likes. It was posted 12 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 37 other coins we checked use the same post. source
- Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (FDSG…pump, umd3…Phcy, R19j…dkMH). source
- On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
- Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive has never saved the site: it is probably as new as the coin.
- Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $10.5K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $105) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
- Same ticker elsewhere23 other coins trade as $FUN. The biggest is FunPay on polygon ($179M, first pool 4mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. source
- Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
- Reused X postThe X post x.com/LaunchondotFUN/status/2116458740060954632 is also listed by 37 other coins we checked: $FUN, $FUN, $FUN, $FUN…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
- Reused websiteThe website launchon.fun is also listed by 33 other coins we checked: $FUN, $FUN, $FUN, $FUN…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
The token
Mint & freeze revoked
- Mint new tokens: locked
- Freeze wallets: locked
- Change name, logo and links: locked
@LaunchondotFUN verified · 263 likes · 150 replies
Pumpfun stopped being FUN So we created a launchpad that is. Introducing .FUN Bringing launches back to @Raydium with a few upgrades: • 100% of platform fees go to $FUN buybacks and burns. We keep 0%. • Built-in trading. Launch and trade in one place. • Anti-vamp https://t.co/pagUHuy2a6
Posted 12 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 37 other coins we checked use the same post.
Track record of these signals
How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals
| Signal this coin has | Fell 80%+ with it | Without it | Coins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Launch buyers that buy many launches | 66% | 57% | 854 |
- Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
- "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.