$CSI / Cyber Security Inu

The 5 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 0.85% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 0.85% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 1 coin we checked; members bought 1 launch block.

Coins they created: $CSI

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

4 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet 6GESFMb8KUChaLshYLvW2k5u9hnPfUB1nwSpp58eeEPV (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 1 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet. Linked buyers took 0.85% of the supply.

• 1 launch buyer (0.85% of supply) were first funded by 6GES…eEPV, which is the creator.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 1 coin we checked; members bought 1 launch block. source
• The teamThe dev and 5 early buyer/holder wallets; 1 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 0.8%; their 136 earlier coins with an outcome: 127 fell 80%+, 1 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @TalkingBenLLM (verified) with 69 likes. It was posted 7 min before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 5 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $66.3K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $663) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/TalkingBenLLM/status/2121351331147624843 is also listed by 5 other coins we checked: $CSI ×5. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.