$E / exposure

SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

Still inside the first 24 hours: updated every 15 minutes. Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($92). Measured 16 h ago.

The 2 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 0.0% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 0 linked groups hold 0% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 1 coin we checked.

Coins they created: $E

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

1 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet GgRHZU4FyxiWBA3Ej2jtpWf3EXxsXV4G1Mc7qa9wYC8J (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 16 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Money outThe dev and 1 launch-block wallets put in more SOL than they took out in the first 24 hours. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 1 coin we checked. source
• The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; their 7 earlier coins with an outcome: 7 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code. source
• AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive has never saved the site: it is probably as new as the coin.
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Reused X accountThe X account @exposuremarkets is also listed by 5 other coins we checked: $E , $E, $Elon, $E …. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website exposure.markets is also listed by 3 other coins we checked: $E , $E, $E . 3 of them came earlier. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.