$BABYPUNCH / Baby Punch

The 5 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 31.61% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 30.33% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 3 coins we checked.

Coins they created: $BABYPUNCH, $SI, $Nagochi

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet G2DxNnTRTG8Tq58PFwtQyuwsgTFaAh1FEmYudTmjsobK (from GeckoTerminal). 2 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

1 red1 of 1 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$SI space inuNot scanned yet. – 5d ago $Nagochi なごちTechDev not checked yet; the price ran past its pool; tech not tested yet 32 -97%a day after scan 9d ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 26 min ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 64 coins on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 3 of them.
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 3 coins we checked. source
• The teamThe dev and 4 early buyer/holder wallets; their 139 earlier coins with an outcome: 109 fell 80%+, 2 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @esotericpigeon (verified) with 4 likes. It was posted 9 min before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 1 other coin we checked use the same post. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $3.0K, 142.2% of the $2.1K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $21) would get roughly 1.4% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere14 other coins trade as $BABYPUNCH. The biggest is Baby Punch on Solana ($80.6K, first pool 32m ago). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 2 other coins we checked. Of the 1 with a 24 h outcome, 1 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/esotericpigeon/status/2119842985026506952 is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $BabyPunch. 1 of them came earlier. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.