$zero / zerocoin

The 3 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 19.95% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 19.95% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 4 coins we checked; members bought 2 launch blocks.

Coins they created: $zero, $FOOD, $memecub, $FLC

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Other coins in our records tied to this creator through the wallet that first funded it.

Creator wallet HbxZJx99uktxBXTCuxSjDYZBcMunTbE1o8qS43jmfjax (from GeckoTerminal). 1 other coin from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

1 red

$FOOD FoodcoinNarrativeThe team's earlier coins: 20 of 20 fell 80%+ within a day; the pool is empty; the same X account is linked by 23 $0at scan 25m ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 7 min ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 4 coins we checked; members bought 2 launch blocks. source
• The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; their 136 earlier coins with an outcome: 127 fell 80%+, 1 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @fearbringschaos (verified) with 4 likes. It was posted 12 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 1 other coin we checked use the same post. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $19.2K, 19.7% of the $97.3K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $973) would get roughly 9.2% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere20 other coins trade as $zero. The biggest is c0mpute on Solana ($145K, first pool 5mo ago). source
• Linked launches2 other coins in our records connect to this creator through funding: $memecub (launched by this creator's funder), $FLC (launched by this creator's funder).
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 1 other coin we checked.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/fearbringschaos/status/2121052026004205996 is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $zero. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.