$ZEPHYRON

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

Trading apps

Where the top holders' money came from

The dev was first funded by D5sN…42mh: a personal wallet.

Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 48 min ago.

The 2 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 67.31% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 67.25% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 11 coins we checked.

Coins they created: $ZEPHYRON ×11

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet GJMoVF4XJMzx2nQWGrRSk4M5uYkEF7tqMnT9BHNHveL8 (from GeckoTerminal). 10 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

5 red

$ZEPHYRONNarrativeThe dev held 66% at our scan; narrative coin, nothing to test 14 1h ago $ZEPHYRONNarrativeThe dev held 67% at our scan; no X account, Telegram or website linked 27 $24.1Kat scan 2h ago $ZEPHYRONNot scanned yet. – 2h ago $ZEPHYRONNarrativeDev has launched 20 coins on pump.fun; only 19 holders; narrative coin, nothing to test 29 $2.4Kat scan 2h ago $ZEPHYRONNot scanned yet. – 2h ago $ZEPHYRONNarrativeThe dev held 54% at our scan; narrative coin, nothing to test 16 $18.2Kat scan 2h ago $ZEPHYRONNot scanned yet. – 2h ago $ZEPHYRONNot scanned yet. – 2h ago $ZEPHYRONNot scanned yet. – 2h ago $ZEPHYRONTechThe team's earlier coins: 9 of 10 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 37 $3.7Kat scan 2h ago

On chain, this wallet launched 20 coins on pump.fun. We're listing them from the chain now; they show here on your next visit.

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 1 h ago.

• Dev67.2%1 wallet
• Launch block67.3%2 wallets

Held right now by the top 20 holders, by tag. Sniper, bundler and side-wallet tags come from every launch we've read, not this coin alone.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 20 coins on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 11 of them.
• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #gf1d60, has 13 of its 55 wallets here: 8.49% held at our check. 15 of the 15 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 11 coins we checked. source
• The teamThe dev and 1 early buyer/holder wallet; 10 earlier coins together, outcomes still coming in. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (9xxn…pump, K8pn…viVi, AukQ…pump). source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive had no saved copy of the site (asked 2 h ago): it is probably as new as the coin.
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $28.0K, 20.6% of the $136K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $1.4K) would get roughly 8.9% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere28 other coins trade as $ZEPHYRON. None of them has real liquidity and trading behind its price. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 10 other coins we checked.
• Reused websiteThe website zephyron.lat is also listed by 7 other coins we checked: $ZEPHYRON ×7. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.