$Verafy

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The 6 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 29.49% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 2 linked groups hold 28.21% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 10 coins we checked.

Coins they created: $Bear ×3, $MULT, $Gib, $Kidcoin, $SI, $Verafy ×2, $STICKY

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Groups of wallets that keep buying launch blocks together, across coins we checked. A crew is a buying pattern; it doesn't say who runs it.

2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet Ge9ekqsgMBqN1xeEYVMV2DbGk6aNwXCkfJX47cEM2PzF (from GeckoTerminal). 9 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

1 red

$Bear Gunny BearNot scanned yet. – 49s ago $Bear Gunny BearNot scanned yet. – 1m ago $Bear Gunny BearNot scanned yet. – 1m ago $MULT Multipli.fiNot scanned yet. – 2m ago $GibNot scanned yet. – 3m ago $KidcoinNot scanned yet. – 3m ago $SI Santa InuNot scanned yet. – 3m ago $VerafyNot scanned yet. – 17m ago $STICKY Sticky NodesTechThe team's earlier coins: 65 of 79 fell 80%+ within a day; a known launch crew bought in; tech not tested yet 19 $22.8Kat scan 32m ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 15 min ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin2 known groups of wallets are in this coin. The largest, holder guild #g36c00, has 4 of its 56 wallets here: 4.75% held at our check. 36 of the 41 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 10 coins we checked. source
• The teamThe dev and 5 early buyer/holder wallets; 2 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 0.4%; their 43 earlier coins with an outcome: 32 fell 80%+, 2 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @rexstjohn (verified) with 4 likes. It was posted 3 min before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (ErXV…pump, FRxs…fC2P, 0x83…2913). source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 61 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $2.2K, 93.4% of the $2.4K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $24) would get roughly 2.1% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere8 other coins trade as $Verafy. None of them has real liquidity and trading behind its price. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 9 other coins we checked.
• Reused websiteThe website usepaid.app is also listed by 200 other coins we checked: $PAID ×3, $Hugo, $DICKBUTTIFIER, $DICKBUTIFI…. It most likely belongs to $PAID, a far bigger coin; this coin is using it. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.