$NUT / NutCoin

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

The first 24 hours are over: the final reading is taken on the next refresh. Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($96). Measured 01 Nov 2026.

The 3 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 19.91% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 0 linked groups hold 0% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 01 Nov 2026.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #gcf80f, has 2 of its 30 wallets here: 0.04% held at our check. 5 of the 13 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Money out$806 (8.4 SOL) taken out in the first 24 hours by 1 of the dev and launch-block wallets. That includes liquidity: 86.0 SOL added to the pool, 94.4 SOL taken back out. source
• The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; their 18 earlier coins with an outcome: 18 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @HonestDevelops. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 5 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Same ticker elsewhere26 other coins trade as $NUT. None of them has a pool with real liquidity behind its price. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/HonestDevelops/status/2116701075386278056 is also listed by 5 other coins we checked: $NUT ×5. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.