$DYC / DacityCoin

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The 14 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 44.79% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 2 linked groups hold 42.25% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 1 coin we checked.

Coins they created: $DYC

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Groups of wallets that keep buying launch blocks together, across coins we checked. A crew is a buying pattern; it doesn't say who runs it.

10 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet 7NK4tGMdqKacg4Ft1XwCE7vDTBrszkn5iEpC5svaQJTV (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 13 min ago.

• Bundlers1.0%3 wallets
• Snipers3.9%5 wallets
• Launch block1.8%4 wallets

Held right now by the top 20 holders, by tag. Sniper, bundler and side-wallet tags come from every launch we've read, not this coin alone.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, launch crew #1cc6b0, has 12 of its 867 wallets here: 33.47% bought in the launch block, 9.75% held at our check. 608 of the 767 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 2 linked wallets; together they created 1 coin we checked. source
• The teamThe dev and 13 early buyer/holder wallets; 8 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 31.1%; 15 earlier coins together, outcomes still coming in. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @marckozonchain with 1 likes. It was posted 22 h before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 4 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (ApZu…pbKg). source
• On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims wallet connection, but its code has no wallet or contract calls. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 85 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $12.7K, 33.4% of the $37.9K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $379) would get roughly 5.6% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere27 other coins trade as $DYC. The biggest is DacityCoin on Solana ($118K, first pool 1d ago). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/marckozonchain/status/2121636355537264818 is also listed by 4 other coins we checked: $DYC ×4. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website cyberleek.vilanerios.com is also listed by 14 other coins we checked: $GTA$ ×8, $DCYC ×2, $DYC ×4. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.