$‮IA / ‮uni suomynonA

SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

Still inside the first 24 hours: updated every 15 minutes. Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($92). Measured 11 h ago.

The 2 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 0.0% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 0 linked groups hold 0% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

1 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 03 Nov 2026.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Money outThe dev and 1 launch-block wallets put in more SOL than they took out in the first 24 hours. source
• The teamThe dev and 1 early buyer/holder wallet; their 5 earlier coins with an outcome: 5 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @mert (verified) with 1,932 likes. It was posted 34 min before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 3 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (6zyP…pump, So11…1112, Toke…Q5DA). source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 57 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $1, 131.0% of the $1 market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $0) would get roughly 1.5% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere3 other coins trade as $‮IA. None of them has a pool with real liquidity behind its price. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/mert/status/2117561277015105912 is also listed by 3 other coins we checked: $zANT, $‮IA, $AI. 1 of them came earlier. source
• Reused websiteThe website otcdesks.cash is also listed by 200 other coins we checked: $KINK, $A71, $Teddy, $CAPE…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.