$Socks / Socks Neobank

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

Still inside the first 24 hours: this reading is from 1 h ago and is refreshed in the background. Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each; some wallets had more). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($72). Measured 1 h ago.

How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

Trading apps

Same fee settings

Where the top holders' money came from

The dev was first funded by BmFd…ymy6: a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot).

Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 1 h ago.

The 4 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 37.41% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 1.0% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet CrSbohT2Tm9RL4NsfriLt9wZ3xo8FVk5HoSKxGoepdVw (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 1 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #g0c365, has 2 of its 4 wallets here: 6.36% held at our check. 16 of the 22 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Same fee settings3 wallets holding 3.7% paid the exact same priority fee: usually one setup running several wallets. source
• Money out$319 (4.4 SOL) taken out in the first 24 hours by 1 of the dev and launch-block wallets. That includes liquidity: 0.2 SOL added to the pool, 0.0 SOL taken back out. source
• The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; their 8 earlier coins with an outcome: 8 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code. source
• On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims wallet connection, but its code has no wallet or contract calls. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 29 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $38.9K, 14.1% of the $275K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $2.8K) would get roughly 12.4% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere26 other coins trade as $Socks. The biggest is Socks Neobank on Solana ($147K, first pool 18m ago). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Reused X accountThe X account @SocksDotFun is also listed by 3 other coins we checked: $Socks ×3. source
• Reused websiteThe website thesocks.fun is also listed by 3 other coins we checked: $Socks ×3. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.