$RAM / Ram Altman

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

Still inside the first 24 hours: this reading is from 34 min ago and is refreshed in the background. Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($97). Measured 34 min ago.

How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

Trading apps

Where the top holders' money came from

Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 30 min ago.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet 7ZX39RMAxqcESVamv2jWVj8GuYryj9g1snDPUmFAowjd (from GeckoTerminal). 7 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

7 red3 of 3 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$Intel AI intel Ai CoinTechThe dev held 93% at our scan; website doesn't show this token's address 22 $26.7Kat scan 17h ago $Intel AI intel Ai CoinTechDev's earlier coins: 2 of 2 fell 80%+ within a day; the pool is empty; website doesn't show this token's addre 28 $28.2Kat scan 18h ago $Intel AI intel Ai CoinTechDev's earlier coins: 2 of 2 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 32 $24.5Kat scan 19h ago $Other Other CatNarrativeThe dev holds none now, nothing against it on record; the same X post is linked by 7 other coins we've seen; 1 35 1d ago $Intel AI intel Ai CoinTechDev's earlier coins: 2 of 2 fell 80%+ within a day; 7% held by wallets one source paid; website doesn't show t 28 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $Intel AI intel Ai CoinTechDev wallet is less than a day old; 9% held by wallets one source paid; website doesn't show this token's addre 34 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $Intel AI intel Ai CoinTechDev's earlier coins: 2 of 2 fell 80%+ within a day; 8% held by wallets one source paid; website doesn't show t 26 -100%a day after scan 1d ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 1 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 0.46%. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #gc957a, has 7 of its 22 wallets here: 1.06% held at our check. 7 of the 8 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Money outThe dev and 0 launch-block wallets put in more SOL than they took out in the first 24 hours. That includes liquidity: 228.0 SOL added to the pool, 0.0 SOL taken back out. source
• The teamOnly the dev wallet: no early buyer or holder wallets found with it; their 3 earlier coins with an outcome: 3 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (6zyP…pump, So11…1112, Toke…Q5DA). source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 59 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $63.7K, 142.7% of the $44.6K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $446) would get roughly 1.4% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere17 other coins trade as $RAM. The biggest is Ramses on Robinhood Chain ($3.1M, first pool 2mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 7 other coins we checked. Of the 3 with a 24 h outcome, 3 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Reused websiteThe website otcdesks.cash is also listed by 200 other coins we checked: $KINK, $A71, $Teddy ×3, $CAPE…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.