$1993 / 1993 forum
Trading for 3d; 6% of supply went to 2 launch-block wallets; the dev can still mint or freeze; 338 holders, top 10 hold 31%.
▲ buy · ▼ sell · ● event. Markers show trades by wallets we know something about (D dev, LB launch-block buyer, C crew, K KOL, S smart money, W large trade, TG callout) and what our live watch flagged. Facts, not a verdict. Charts by TradingView.
Holder concentration
Top holders mapped by share
holderthe devinsiderother colours: same funderpool or service
Deepest pools
Top 2 by liquidity
Bar = share of all liquidity across the coin's pools. Pools from DexScreener.
Bubble map
Top 20 holders · size = share · lines = same funder
holderthe devinsiderpool or service
How we scanned the website
1993.forum
- 1Opened 1993.forum in our sandboxed browser5 requests in 10.3s
- 2Read its code 2 scriptsReact, Remix / React Router, Supabase client
- 3Talks to 1 own host, nothing outside–
- 4Wallet code connects a wallet · shows this coin's address
- 5Tech claims 1 of 1 backed by its own code ✓ On-chain / smart contracts
Over time
Liquidity, holders and market cap
Recording started: we read this coin every 10 minutes from now on, and the charts fill in over the next hour.
What moved it
biggest move in 24 h · 5 h ago- No trigger found No call, post, graduation or trade by a wallet we know lines up with it (no trade list for this pool, so only candles were read).
The number is how well size and timing line up (0–100). It says who traded and when, not why. All movers
Money out
SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.
| Group | Wallets | Bought | Sold | Liquidity in / out | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYMR…xx34 | 1 | 0.23 SOL | 0.00 SOL | 0.0 / 0.0 | -0.23 SOL · $-22 |
The first 24 hours are over: the final reading is taken on the next refresh. Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($96). Measured 31 Oct 2026.
The launch block, by who paid for it
The 2 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 6.21% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 0 linked groups hold 0% of it.
| Group | Wallets | Share bought | Taken out (24 h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fhbh…oggA on its own | 1 | 5.63% | · |
| DYMR…xx34 on its own | 1 | 0.58% | -0.23 SOL · $-22 |
Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.
The team
The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.
| DYMR…xx34 | early buyer · 0.6% | 1 earlier coin: 0 fell 80%+, 1 2x+ | |
| Fhbh…oggA | early buyer · 5.6% | no earlier coins seen |
Money map
Loading who funded whom…Arrows show money moving (the first money a wallet received) and coins bought or held. Facts from the chain, not a verdict about anyone.
At a glance
- Mint & freezeStill on (2)
- Bought in the launch block6.2% by 2 wallets
- Held by top 1031%
- Website tech claims backed1 of 1
- AI agent saw working1 of 3
- Socialssite X
Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.
Top holders
Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.
Source RugCheck, read 31 Oct 2026.
| # | Wallet | Holds | What we know |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raydium CPMM Pool | 16.41% | |
| 2 | 69nv…GLEY | 10.56% | nothing stands out |
| 3 | CGF5…BYVE | 2.99% | nothing stands out |
| 4 | 8Jm2…bgTQ | 2.70% | nothing stands out |
| 5 | 8mKv…5dgv | 2.46% | nothing stands out |
| 6 | 6TbD…ML1b | 2.23% | nothing stands out |
| 7 | HJvA…JxXp | 2.19% | nothing stands out |
| 8 | 5Uks…scnY | 2.07% | nothing stands out |
| 9 | 6Fea…NHWj | 2.06% | nothing stands out |
| 10 | AjS2…kqNF | 2.00% | nothing stands out |
| 11 | 4DE6…oUCU | 1.80% | nothing stands out |
| 12 | 7nFK…3tWZ | 1.79% | nothing stands out |
| 13 | 59pu…XtQ8 | 1.57% | nothing stands out |
| 14 | CaPV…BzSp | 1.46% | nothing stands out |
| 15 | 3tx5…wVY8 | 1.45% | nothing stands out |
| 16 | BDWm…wkqH | 1.41% | nothing stands out |
| 17 | FKA1…mbeD | 1.38% | nothing stands out |
| 18 | 4b3Z…DQKh | 1.32% | nothing stands out |
| 19 | fNr1…5z49 | 1.31% | nothing stands out |
| 20 | 6jpv…q7HU | 1.29% | nothing stands out |
Holder map
The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100.0%.
Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.
Launch map
The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.
Launch tape (log time from creation)
Live activity
What we're seeing
- Waiting for trades…
Latest trades
Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)
| Wallet | Bought | Sold | Net | Trades | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for trades… | |||||
Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.
Trading for 3d; 6% of supply went to 2 launch-block wallets; the dev can still mint or freeze; 338 holders, top 10 hold 31%.
- Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive had no saved copy of the site (asked 4 days ago): it is probably as new as the coin.
Cross-checks
What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.
- Money outThe dev and 0 launch-block wallets put in more SOL than they took out in the first 24 hours. source
- The teamThe dev and 1 early buyer/holder wallet; 1 earlier coin together, outcomes still coming in. source
- Website shows this token's addressThe token's address appears on its website or in the site's code. source
- On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
- Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive had no saved copy of the site (asked 4 days ago): it is probably as new as the coin.
- Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $23.0K, 29.7% of the $77.4K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $774) would get roughly 6.3% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
- Reused X accountThe X account @1993Forum is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $1993. source
The token
2 dev controls still on
- Mint new tokens: locked
- Freeze wallets: locked
- Change name, logo and links: can still be used
- Change the transfer fee: can still be used
The website
1 of 1 tech claims backed
- On-chain / smart contracts: evidence found
Track record of these signals
How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals
| Signal this coin has | Fell 80%+ with it | Without it | Coins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mint or freeze power still usable | 60% | 61% | 429 |
| Risky contract permissions (GoPlus) | 74% | 61% | 386 |
- Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
- "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.