$CHILLCATS

SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

Still inside the first 24 hours: updated every 15 minutes. Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($93). Measured 3 h ago.

The 4 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 26.03% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 25.75% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Other coins in our records tied to this creator through the wallet that first funded it.

Creator wallet 7DSJa3ULLKJjqBAibFEBR931Dr4hE41ykPDdok9tRH7S (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 6 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 9.65%. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 1 coin on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 1 of them.
• Money out$6,274 (67.7 SOL) taken out in the first 24 hours by 4 of the dev and launch-block wallets, in 1 linked group. source
• The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets. source
• Website shows this token's addressThe token's address appears on its website or in the site's code. source
• On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims on-chain / smart contracts, but its code has no wallet or contract calls. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive has never saved the site: it is probably as new as the coin.
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $29.0K, 25.3% of the $115K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $1.1K) would get roughly 7.3% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere29 other coins trade as $CHILLCATS. None of them has a pool with real liquidity behind its price. source
• Linked launches20 other coins in our records connect to this creator through funding: $SOMETHING (creator funded by the same wallet), $SOMETHING (creator funded by the same wallet), $Rapport (creator funded by the same wallet), $SLEGO (creator funded by the same wallet)….

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.