$STONK

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet 6MXyGo8WVbVF1hGguvqsURWnocNZ7e2SNZQrLYTs9y9f (from GeckoTerminal). 33 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

33 red20 of 20 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$FLOATTechDev's earlier coins: 20 of 20 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 24 $13.1Kat scan 36m ago $FLOATTechDev's earlier coins: 20 of 20 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 22 $8.0Kat scan 40m ago $MELT MeltfaceTechDev's earlier coins: 20 of 20 fell 80%+ within a day; tech not tested yet 17 $7.6Kat scan 6h ago $PIRATE Pirate Shop TokenVampDev's earlier coins: 18 of 18 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 2 other coins we've seen 19 $7.4Kat scan 6h ago $PuddgyTechDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; tech not tested yet 17 10h ago $PuddgyTechDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; tech not tested yet 17 $7.3Kat scan 11h ago $Whitehouse Dana WhitehouseVampDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 21 12h ago $Whitehouse Dana WhitehouseVampDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 21 12h ago $José Be Like JoséTechDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 14 $490Kat scan 21h ago $dugeTechDev's earlier coins: 19 of 19 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 23 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $dugeTechThe dev held 90% at our scan; website doesn't show this token's address 20 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $dugeTechDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 23 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $dugeTechThe dev held 91% at our scan; website doesn't show this token's address 20 $11at scan 1d ago $GTA6 GTA VITechDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 22 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $OREY OrreryTechDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; on-chain claim, no wallet code 22 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $OREY OrreryTechDev's earlier coins: 16 of 16 fell 80%+ within a day; the website backs 0 of its 5 tech claims with its own co 14 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $DiamondVampDev's earlier coins: 16 of 16 fell 80%+ within a day; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 21 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $MAMESUKETechDev's earlier coins: 16 of 16 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 23 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $PICASSO The Pilot PicassoNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 15 of 15 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 3 other coins we've seen 26 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $LMC Laughing Monkey CoinNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 13 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; no X account, Telegram or website linked 19 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $LMC Laughing Monkey CoinNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 12 of 12 fell 80%+ within a day; no X account, Telegram or website linked 19 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $bracketTechDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 24 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $ELIZUBETH Elizubeth WurrenNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 3 other coins we've seen 19 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $ELIZUBETH Elizubeth WurrenNarrativeThe dev held 76% at our scan; the same X post is linked by 3 other coins we've seen 16 $1.7Kat scan 2d ago $ELIZUBETH Elizubeth WurrenNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 3 other coins we've seen 17 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $Punjimogui The Nietzschean PunjimoguinTechDev's earlier coins: 15 of 15 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 24 $7.4Kat scan 2d ago $BenBen べんべんNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 16 of 16 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 2 other coins we've seen 22 -100%a day after scan 3d ago $HIGH higher.funTechDev's earlier coins: 13 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; tech not tested yet 25 -100%a day after scan 3d ago $PIKACOIN Pikachu CoinTechDev's earlier coins: 15 of 15 fell 80%+ within a day; the website backs 1 of its 3 tech claims with its own co 22 -100%a day after scan 3d ago $LEEROY Leeroy JenkinsVampDev's earlier coins: 16 of 16 fell 80%+ within a day; no X account, Telegram or website linked 19 -100%a day after scan 3d ago

Showing the newest 30 of 33.

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 3 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 1.23%. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #gaf5d9, has 2 of its 35 wallets here: 3.15% held at our check. 19 of the 19 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• The teamThe dev and 1 early buyer/holder wallet; 1 connected to the dev (funding or crew); their 20 earlier coins with an outcome: 20 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• Website names another $STONKThe website shows 6GmA…UNgx, a coin also called $STONK, first pool 108 days before this one, and not this token's address: this coin may be borrowing that project's website. source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 89 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $4.9M market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $49.4K) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere5 other coins trade as $STONK. The biggest is STONK on Solana ($162M, first pool 2mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 33 other coins we checked. Of the 20 with a 24 h outcome, 20 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Reused X accountThe X account @stonkfun is also listed by 12 other coins we checked: $STONK ×12. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website stonkfun.xyz is also listed by 168 other coins we checked: $TOKEN, $FTR, $STONK ×11, $ELON-SAN ×3…. It most likely belongs to $MAMESUKE, a far bigger coin; this coin is using it. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.