$LABS

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The dev is one of 16 linked wallets; together they created 6 coins we checked; members bought 3 launch blocks.

Coins they created: $LABS, $lucky, $SPERM, $SPERM, $PODCAT, $BlackShiba

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet J8PHQPzrmbKiMHBEvHnEkoVobj6LMEgp2xvRR6kmawbN (from GeckoTerminal). 1 other coin from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

1 red

$lucky dont ignore this catVamp1 early wallet is connected to the dev; the pool is empty; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 34 $8.4Kat scan 58m ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 36 min ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 3.01%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #gee7ac, has 7 of its 38 wallets here: 3.78% held at our check. 4 of the 15 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 16 linked wallets; together they created 6 coins we checked; members bought 3 launch blocks. source
• The teamThe dev and 4 early buyer/holder wallets; 4 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 0%; 1 earlier coin together, outcomes still coming in. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @intelligentdog9 (verified) with 27 likes. It was posted 17 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 5 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $2.4K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $24) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere30 other coins trade as $LABS. The biggest is Solana Labs on Robinhood Chain ($36.1K, first pool 1h ago). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 1 other coin we checked.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/intelligentdog9/status/2118692255347159399 is also listed by 5 other coins we checked: $LABS ×5. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.