$EZ / Earnings Zeason

The 2 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 66.46% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 66.15% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 28 linked wallets; together they created 8 coins we checked, and 3 of 5 with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day; members bought 4 launch blocks.

Coins they created: $ATTL, $EZ, $whistle, $Yieldmos, $SEED, $POKEMOG, $nxb, $ANT

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet AGCAo7WnkbvVw5rF1Nj4dTK4LXDLngXoBxaD2MeKWWL7 (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 3 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 1 coin on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 1 of them.
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 28 linked wallets; together they created 8 coins we checked, and 3 of 5 with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day; members bought 4 launch blocks. source
• The teamThe dev and 1 early buyer/holder wallet; 1 earlier coin together, outcomes still coming in. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code. source
• AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive had no saved copy of the site (asked 3 h ago): it is probably as new as the coin.
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $29.3K, 30.4% of the $96.5K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $965) would get roughly 6.2% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere4 other coins trade as $EZ. None of them has a pool with real liquidity behind its price. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.