$FIGHTDT / STAND FIGHT DEFEND

How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

Trading apps

Same fee settings

Where the top holders' money came from

The dev was first funded by 5xk6…NUNU: a personal wallet.

Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 1 h ago.

The 13 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 43.94% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 2.57% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 2 coins we checked.

Coins they created: $FIGHTDT ×2

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Other coins in our records tied to this creator through the wallet that first funded it.

Creator wallet 3tk3rYR3FmLAxLbQebhKgptQcpQkPPWBJoQWH6bCTBbP (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 1 coin on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 1 of them.
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 2 coins we checked. source
• The teamThe dev and 12 early buyer/holder wallets; their 176 earlier coins with an outcome: 135 fell 80%+, 3 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @WhiteHouse (verified) with 12,369 likes. It was posted 1 min before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 1 other coin we checked use the same post. source
• Same ticker elsewhere5 other coins trade as $FIGHTDT. None of them has real liquidity and trading behind its price. source
• Linked launches1 other coin in our records connects to this creator through funding: $FIGHTDT (creator funded by this creator).
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/WhiteHouse/status/2120276666668970387 is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $FIGHTDT. 1 of them came earlier. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.