$Datacenter

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet DV2tvsB7sR84oFWdNLJwc9TFKNZv6HW6Nm4Qy5XmEAGp (from GeckoTerminal). 63 other coins from it in our records (newest 30 listed). It is also named for large coins ($AGC, $FAGENT): one person rarely launches several, so this is most likely a shared deployer or GeckoTerminal's guess, and the list isn't counted as this dev's record: Open the wallet ›

1 green18 yellow30 red18 of 31 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$DatacenterTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; the pool is empty; website doesn't show this token's address 34 $20.1Kat scan 1h ago $PVZ Plants vs. ZombiesTechReused website, a relaunch pattern; 9% held by wallets one source paid; website doesn't show this token's addr 29 $18.1Kat scan 3h ago $bracketTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; the pool is empty; website doesn't show this token's address 34 $14.9Kat scan 4h ago $Redflag China's Red FlagTechReused website, a relaunch pattern; the website backs 0 of its 1 tech claims with its own code 22 $13.8Kat scan 8h ago $MicroduckTechReused X account, a relaunch pattern; the pool is empty; on-chain claim, no wallet code 33 $19.6Kat scan 12h ago $MicroduckTechReused X account, a relaunch pattern; 9% held by wallets one source paid; on-chain claim, no wallet code 29 $24.1Kat scan 14h ago $MicroduckTechReused X account, a relaunch pattern; 9% held by wallets one source paid; on-chain claim, no wallet code 29 $20.5Kat scan 17h ago $MicroduckTech6 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 0%; 10% held by wallets one source paid; the website backs 1 19 21h ago $眉眉 meimeiVampReused X account, a relaunch pattern; 11% held by wallets one source paid; copies the ticker of an older, bigg 23 $16.4Kat scan 1d ago $RubbishTechReused website, a relaunch pattern; the pool is empty; website doesn't show this token's address 34 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $Claude AI ClaudeTechReused X account, a relaunch pattern; the pool is empty; website doesn't show this token's address 34 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $AGC Agentic CoinVampThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; top 10 hold 100%; narrative coin, nothing to test 27 3d ago $AGC Agentic CoinVampThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; top 10 hold 100%; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a 26 3d ago $AGC Agentic CoinNarrativeNothing on record against the dev; narrative coin, nothing to test 65 -100%a day after scan 3d ago $Claude Claude AiTechReused X account, a relaunch pattern; the AI agent saw only 0 of 3 claimed features working 65 -100%a day after scan 3d ago $FAGENTTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; top 10 hold 100%; website doesn't show this token's address 31 3d ago $FAGENTTechThe dev held 89% at our scan; website names another $FAGENT 25 -100%a day after scan 3d ago $FAGENTTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; website names another $FAGENT 64 +683%a day after scan 3d ago $FAGENTTech6 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 0%; 9% held by wallets one source paid; website names anothe 34 -79%a day after scan 4d ago $FAGENTTechNothing on record against the dev; only 13 holders; website names another $FAGENT 35 -100%a day after scan 4d ago $FAGENTTechNothing on record against the dev; website names another $FAGENT 64 4d ago $FAGENTTechNothing on record against the dev; website names another $FAGENT 65 $16at scan 5d ago $FAGENTTechNothing on record against the dev; website names another $FAGENT 64 -63%a day after scan 5d ago $SAFU SAFU FundVamp3 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 0%; 8% held by wallets one source paid; copies the ticker of 24 -100%a day after scan 5d ago $SAFU SAFU FundVamp4 early wallets are connected to the dev, holding 0%; 7% held by wallets one source paid; copies the ticker of 24 -100%a day after scan 5d ago $Brilliant A Glorious LifeNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 22 of 41 fell 80%+ within a day; no X account, Telegram or website linked 31 -100%a day after scan 6d ago $effort Strive and work hardNarrativeNothing on record against the dev; no X account, Telegram or website linked 63 +156%a day after scan 6d ago $effort Strive and work hardNarrativeNothing on record against the dev; top 10 hold 100%; no X account, Telegram or website linked 28 -5%a day after scan 6d ago $effort Strive and work hardNarrativeNothing on record against the dev; no X account, Telegram or website linked 63 -99%a day after scan 6d ago $HalloweenuNarrativeNothing on record against the dev; the same X post is linked by 13 other coins we've seen 63 +220%a day after scan 6d ago

Showing the newest 30 of 49.

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 25 min ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 0.52%. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #gd0127, has 5 of its 57 wallets here: 8.53% held at our check. 28 of the 59 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; 3 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 0%. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @zyr70 with 22 likes. It was posted 16 days before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. 4 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (3NJC…pump, AAPL…LnB8, XsbE…JzJp). source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 60 days before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $50.0K, 131.7% of the $37.9K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $379) would get roughly 1.5% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThe address named as this coin's creator is also named for 63 other coins we checked, large ones among them ($AGC, $FAGENT). One person rarely launches several big coins, so it is most likely a shared deployer or a data source's guess: not counted as a record.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/GoldenCatDev/status/2112780372781998266 is also listed by 4 other coins we checked: $Datacenter ×4. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website otcdesks.cash is also listed by 200 other coins we checked: $KINK, $A71, $Teddy ×3, $CAPE…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.