$牛逼

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The 2 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 19.95% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 19.95% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 6 coins we checked.

Coins they created: $牛逼 ×4, $ALICE, $QUINN

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

1 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Other coins in our records tied to this creator through the wallet that first funded it.

Creator wallet BhstVQbdZ7R3FVMNRc3zMCcogDV8c7JqeaMNcjGoHTYv (from GeckoTerminal). 2 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

2 red

$牛逼TechThe team's earlier coins: 20 of 20 fell 80%+ within a day; the pool is empty; website doesn't show this token' 24 $0at scan 17m ago $牛逼TechThe team's earlier coins: 127 of 136 fell 80%+ within a day; the pool is empty; website doesn't show this toke 24 $0at scan 22m ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 1 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Promises vs the chain1 of 2 promises don't hold: liquidity locked or burned (Only 0% of the pool's liquidity is locked or burned) source
• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #g8d3d6, has 6 of its 16 wallets here: 0.65% held at our check. 13 of the 14 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 6 coins we checked. source
• The teamThe dev and 1 early buyer/holder wallet; their 20 earlier coins with an outcome: 20 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @elonmusk (verified) with 70,096 likes. It was posted 4 h before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 14 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (0xae…6c4a, 0x93…8e33, 0xa4…bf57). source
• AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 5 years (1,800 days) before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $81.9K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $819) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere24 other coins trade as $牛逼. The biggest is 牛逼 on BNB Chain ($5.6M, first pool 5h ago). source
• Linked launches3 other coins in our records connect to this creator through funding: $牛逼 (launched by this creator's funder), $ALICE (launched by this creator's funder), $QUINN (launched by this creator's funder).
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 2 other coins we checked.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/elonmusk/status/2119629310969467053 is also listed by 14 other coins we checked: $牛逼 ×13, $中国人牛逼. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused Telegram groupThe Telegram group t.me/awesomebsc is also listed by 6 other coins we checked: $牛逼 ×6. It most likely belongs to $牛逼, a far bigger coin; this coin is using it. source
• Reused websiteThe website awesomeme.xyz is also listed by 4 other coins we checked: $牛逼 ×4. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.