$SGNL / No Signal
20% of supply went to 3 launch-block wallets; mint and freeze revoked; 185 holders, top 10 hold 81%.
▲ buy · ▼ sell · ● event. Markers show trades by wallets we know something about (D dev, LB launch-block buyer, C crew, K KOL, S smart money, W large trade, TG callout) and what our live watch flagged. Facts, not a verdict. Charts by TradingView.
Holder concentration
Top holders mapped by share
holderthe devinsiderother colours: same funderpool or service
Deepest pools
Top 5 by liquidity
No pools found yet: the coin may still be on its launch curve.
Bubble map
Top 20 holders · size = share · lines = same funder
holderthe devinsiderpool or service
How we scanned the website
nosignal.meme
- 1Opened nosignal.meme in our sandboxed browser37 requests in 10.2s
- 2Read its code 22 scriptsNext.js, React
- 3Talks to 1 own host, nothing outside–
- 4Wallet code no wallet code · doesn't show this coin's address
- 5Tech claims 2 of 2 backed by its own code ✓ AI / agents✓ Live data / analytics
Over time
Liquidity, holders and market cap
Recording started: we read this coin every 10 minutes from now on, and the charts fill in over the next hour.
What moved it
biggest move in 24 h · 02 Nov 2026- Quiet day The biggest swing in 24 hours was +0%.
The number is how well size and timing line up (0–100). It says who traded and when, not why. All movers
Money out: we found no trades of this coin from the dev's or the launch-block wallets' token accounts in its first 24 hours (bots that trade through throwaway accounts can hide from this).
The launch block, by who paid for it
The 3 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 19.9% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 0 linked groups hold 0% of it.
| Group | Wallets | Share bought | Taken out (24 h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9Azs…Xk6w on its own | 1 | 19.9% | +0.00 SOL · $0 |
| 2Wpe…p93t on its own sniper | 1 | 0.0% | · |
| GQhp…bWdJ on its own sniper | 1 | 0.0% | +0.00 SOL · $0 |
Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.
The team
The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.
| 2Wpe…p93t | early buyer sniper | 779 earlier coins: 15 fell 80%+, 0 2x+ | |
| GQhp…bWdJ | early buyer sniper | 152 earlier coins: 1 fell 80%+, 0 2x+ | |
| 9Azs…Xk6w | early buyer · 19.9% | no earlier coins seen |
Money map
Loading who funded whom…Arrows show money moving (the first money a wallet received) and coins bought or held. Facts from the chain, not a verdict about anyone.
Repeat launch buyers
2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.
| 2Wpe…p93t | 779 other launches | 11jJ… 1ydW… 21f3… 22H6… |
| GQhp…bWdJ | 152 other launches | 141n… 2JGr… 2MMw… 2Vzp… |
At a glance
- Mint & freezeRevoked
- Bought in the launch block19.9% by 3 wallets
- Held by top 1081%
- Website tech claims backed2 of 2
- AI agent saw working3 of 3
- Socialssite X
Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.
Top holders
Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.
Source RugCheck, read 01 Nov 2026.
| # | Wallet | Holds | What we know |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FhVo…HLuM | 80.09% | nothing stands out |
| 2 | Pump Fun AMM | 18.26% | |
| 3 | 9nqG…Xbn1 | 0.45% | nothing stands out |
| 4 | FCqC…Lnwb | 0.09% | busy wallet |
| 5 | 7PyB…yVwT | 0.08% | busy wallet |
| 6 | 9MG9…dycv | 0.08% | busy wallet |
| 7 | AWFG…hKRE | 0.07% | busy wallet |
| 8 | 6e6J…TPpC | 0.07% | busy wallet |
| 9 | 6Y4i…NX9z | 0.06% | busy wallet |
| 10 | 6dJY…Tak3 | 0.06% | busy wallet |
| 11 | CoNh…gdLN | 0.05% | busy wallet |
| 12 | 2xRK…TD3f | 0.04% | busy wallet |
| 13 | CpEs…NNWN | 0.04% | nothing stands out |
| 14 | BDuk…xSqA | 0.03% | nothing stands out |
| 15 | 64cn…ZMWw | 0.03% | nothing stands out |
| 16 | EHAA…kJtL | 0.02% | nothing stands out |
| 17 | 62qc…fNgV | 0.02% | nothing stands out |
| 18 | 8ypc…8LaP | 0.02% | nothing stands out |
| 19 | 2EKA…XM2g | 0.02% | nothing stands out |
| 20 | 4ikR…WaWU | 0.02% | nothing stands out |
Holder map
The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.
Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.
Launch map
The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.
Launch tape (log time from creation)
Live activity
What we're seeing
- Waiting for trades…
Latest trades
Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)
| Wallet | Bought | Sold | Net | Trades | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for trades… | |||||
Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.
20% of supply went to 3 launch-block wallets; mint and freeze revoked; 185 holders, top 10 hold 81%.
- The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; their 15 earlier coins with an outcome: 15 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day.
- Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (0x0a…9ffe, wFET…SGNL).
- AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers).
- Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive has never saved the site: it is probably as new as the coin.
- Reused X accountThe X account @nosignaldotmeme is also listed by 3 other coins we checked: $SGNL, $SGNL, $SGNL. 1 of them came earlier.
Cross-checks
What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.
- The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; their 15 earlier coins with an outcome: 15 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
- Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (0x0a…9ffe, wFET…SGNL). source
- AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
- Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive has never saved the site: it is probably as new as the coin.
- Reused X accountThe X account @nosignaldotmeme is also listed by 3 other coins we checked: $SGNL, $SGNL, $SGNL. 1 of them came earlier. source
- Reused websiteThe website nosignal.meme is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $SGNL. source
The token
Mint & freeze revoked
- Mint new tokens: locked
- Freeze wallets: locked
- Change name, logo and links: locked
The website
2 of 2 tech claims backed
- AI / agents: evidence found
- Live data / analytics: evidence found
Track record of these signals
How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals
| Signal this coin has | Fell 80%+ with it | Without it | Coins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top 10 hold 50%+ | 77% | 54% | 2765 |
| Launch buyers that buy many launches | 67% | 59% | 880 |
| Liquidity not locked | 79% | 58% | 951 |
- Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
- "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.