$NB

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The dev is one of 6 linked wallets; together they created 22 coins we checked, and 9 of 9 with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day.

Coins they created: $UODF, $牛逼, $NB ×2, $真诚, $MASK ×4, $韩国人会飞 ×3

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet BmHUzrLVeJoRiqfAkmCCvaJMMNEzYiue5xjDVeKGdYLZ (from GeckoTerminal). 8 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

8 red

$UODF United Oil Dividend FundVampSerial launcher: 8 other coins from this dev; the pool is empty; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a 32 $19.1Kat scan 30m ago $牛逼TechReused website, a relaunch pattern; the pool is empty; website doesn't show this token's address 34 $19.2Kat scan 1h ago $NBTechReused website, a relaunch pattern; only 18 holders; website doesn't show this token's address 28 6h ago $真诚 真诚才是必杀技VampSerial launcher: 6 other coins from this dev; the pool is empty; the linked X post by @heyibinance doesn't nam 35 $19.4Kat scan 14h ago $MASK NullmaskTechDev wallet is less than a day old; the pool is empty; on-chain claim, no wallet code 34 $19.4Kat scan 15h ago $MASK NullmaskTechDev wallet is less than a day old; the pool is empty; on-chain claim, no wallet code 29 $19.0Kat scan 17h ago $MASK NullmaskTechDev wallet is less than a day old; the pool is empty; on-chain claim, no wallet code 28 19h ago $MASK NullmaskTechDev wallet is less than a day old; the pool is empty; the website backs 1 of its 3 tech claims with its own co 23 $19.7Kat scan 20h ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 2 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 1.2%. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Promises vs the chain1 of 2 promises don't hold: liquidity locked or burned (Only 0% of the pool's liquidity is locked or burned) source
• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #gc957a, has 10 of its 44 wallets here: 2.79% held at our check. 31 of the 32 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 6 linked wallets; together they created 22 coins we checked, and 9 of 9 with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• The teamOnly the dev wallet: no early buyer or holder wallets found with it; 8 earlier coins together, outcomes still coming in. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (0xae…6c4a, 0x93…8e33, 0xa4…bf57). source
• AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
• On-chain features in the codeThe site's code contains wallet or contract code. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 5 years (1,801 days) before the coin launched. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $79.3K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $793) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere26 other coins trade as $NB. The biggest is NB on BNB Chain ($5.5K, first pool 1d ago). source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 8 other coins we checked.
• Reused X accountThe X account @Awesomebsc is also listed by 4 other coins we checked: $牛逼 ×3, $NB. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused Telegram groupThe Telegram group t.me/awesomebsc is also listed by 15 other coins we checked: $牛逼 ×10, $shiken, $我丢雷老谋, $Cupsey ×2…. It most likely belongs to $牛逼, a far bigger coin; this coin is using it. source
• Reused websiteThe website awesomeme.xyz is also listed by 10 other coins we checked: $牛逼 ×9, $NB. It most likely belongs to $牛逼, a far bigger coin; this coin is using it. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.