$RWA / Real World Asses

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

Still inside the first 24 hours: updated every 15 minutes. Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($83). Measured 15 min ago.

How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

Trading apps

Where the top holders' money came from

Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 12 min ago.

The 4 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 62.58% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 0.86% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Groups of wallets that keep buying launch blocks together, across coins we checked. A crew is a buying pattern; it doesn't say who runs it.

2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 57 min ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin2 known groups of wallets are in this coin. The largest, launch crew #1cc6b0, has 3 of its 606 wallets here: 0.86% bought in the launch block, 1.85% held at our check. 361 of the 454 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Money out$4,606 (55.2 SOL) taken out in the first 24 hours by 2 of the dev and launch-block wallets, in 1 linked group. source
• The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; 2 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 0.9%; their 15 earlier coins with an outcome: 9 fell 80%+, 2 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @nfadyorky (verified) with 27 likes. It was posted 1 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 3 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $2.3K, 1.2% of the $193K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $1.9K) would get roughly 62.4% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere22 other coins trade as $RWA. The biggest is Allo on BNB Chain ($2.1M, first pool 17mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. An older coin with the same name (C6FB…kzLy) had its pool go from $23.4K to $0 4m ago. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/nfadyorky/status/2120250173657870801 is also listed by 3 other coins we checked: $RWA ×3. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.