$Architect

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The 5 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 56.12% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 2 linked groups hold 53.56% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Groups of wallets that keep buying launch blocks together, across coins we checked. A crew is a buying pattern; it doesn't say who runs it.

4 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet F8fPhUtw4Lo6QA14fE4kXDF7syrPtG2VTUX3iqh2zHyV (from GeckoTerminal). 1 other coin from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

1 red1 of 1 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$LendTechA 10-day-old dev wallet held none at scan, nothing on record; only 21% of the supply in the pool; tech not tes 36 -93%a day after scan 2d ago

On chain, this wallet launched 3 coins on pump.fun. We're listing them from the chain now; they show here on your next visit.

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 35 min ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 3 coins on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 2 of them.
• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, launch crew #1cc6b0, has 2 of its 643 wallets here: 10.96% bought in the launch block. 390 of the 493 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• The teamThe dev and 4 early buyer/holder wallets; 2 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 11.0%; their 35 earlier coins with an outcome: 26 fell 80%+, 1 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @architectpad (verified) with 5 likes. It was posted 1 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. source
• Same ticker elsewhere6 other coins trade as $Architect. The biggest is Architect on Solana ($11.3K, first pool 42m ago). source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 1 other coin we checked. Of the 1 with a 24 h outcome, 1 fell 80% or more within a day.

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.