$OREY / Orrery

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet 6MXyGo8WVbVF1hGguvqsURWnocNZ7e2SNZQrLYTs9y9f (from GeckoTerminal). 27 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

27 red16 of 16 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$PuddgyTechDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; tech not tested yet 18 $7.3Kat scan 48m ago $Whitehouse Dana WhitehouseNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 2 other coins we've seen 21 1h ago $Whitehouse Dana WhitehouseNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 2 other coins we've seen 21 2h ago $José Be Like JoséTechDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 15 $490Kat scan 11h ago $dugeTechDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 23 $8.4Kat scan 15h ago $dugeTechThe dev held 90% at our scan; website doesn't show this token's address 21 $9.9Kat scan 15h ago $dugeTechDev's earlier coins: 17 of 17 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 23 $9.0Kat scan 18h ago $dugeTechThe dev held 91% at our scan; website doesn't show this token's address 21 $11at scan 21h ago $GTA6 GTA VITechDev's earlier coins: 16 of 16 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 21 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $OREY OrreryTechDev's earlier coins: 16 of 16 fell 80%+ within a day; on-chain claim, no wallet code 22 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $DiamondVampDev's earlier coins: 16 of 16 fell 80%+ within a day; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 21 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $MAMESUKETechDev's earlier coins: 16 of 16 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 23 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $PICASSO The Pilot PicassoNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 15 of 15 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 3 other coins we've seen 26 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $LMC Laughing Monkey CoinNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 13 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; no X account, Telegram or website linked 19 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $LMC Laughing Monkey CoinNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 12 of 12 fell 80%+ within a day; no X account, Telegram or website linked 19 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $bracketTechDev's earlier coins: 14 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 24 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $ELIZUBETH Elizubeth WurrenNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 13 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 3 other coins we've seen 19 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $ELIZUBETH Elizubeth WurrenNarrativeThe dev held 76% at our scan; the same X post is linked by 3 other coins we've seen 16 $1.7Kat scan 2d ago $ELIZUBETH Elizubeth WurrenNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 13 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 3 other coins we've seen 17 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $Punjimogui The Nietzschean PunjimoguinTechDev's earlier coins: 15 of 15 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 24 $7.4Kat scan 2d ago $BenBen べんべんNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 13 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 2 other coins we've seen 22 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $HIGH higher.funTechDev's earlier coins: 13 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; tech not tested yet 25 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $PIKACOIN Pikachu CoinTechDev's earlier coins: 15 of 15 fell 80%+ within a day; the website backs 1 of its 3 tech claims with its own co 22 -100%a day after scan 3d ago $LEEROY Leeroy JenkinsVampDev's earlier coins: 13 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; no X account, Telegram or website linked 19 -100%a day after scan 3d ago $FOMONK Fomo MonkeysTechDev's earlier coins: 14 of 14 fell 80%+ within a day; on-chain claim, no wallet code 23 $8.8Kat scan 4d ago $FOMONK Fomo MonkeysTechDev's earlier coins: 13 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; on-chain claim, no wallet code 23 -100%a day after scan 4d ago $AMD A Meme DogVampDev's earlier coins: 13 of 13 fell 80%+ within a day; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 20 -100%a day after scan 4d ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 27 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 1.23%. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #g69c8e, has 2 of its 19 wallets here. source
• The teamThe dev and 1 early buyer/holder wallet; 1 connected to the dev (funding or crew); their 16 earlier coins with an outcome: 16 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• Website names another $OREYThe website shows 2nB8…Thse, a coin also called $OREY, first pool 18 h before this one, and not this token's address: this coin may be borrowing that project's website. source
• AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
• On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims on-chain / smart contracts, but its code has no wallet or contract calls. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site on the day the coin launched. source
• Code age vs launchThe GitHub repository orrery-node/orrery was created 1 days before the coin launched. source
• Same ticker elsewhere1 other coin trades as $OREY. None of them has real liquidity and trading behind its price. An older coin with the same name (98ne…NjvL) had its pool go from $18.4K to $0 1d ago. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 27 other coins we checked. Of the 16 with a 24 h outcome, 16 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Reused X accountThe X account @OrreryNode is also listed by 2 other coins we checked: $OREY ×2. source
• Reused websiteThe website orrerynode.com is also listed by 2 other coins we checked: $OREY ×2. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.