$GTA$ / GTA Dollars

The 4 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 20.05% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 20.05% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 6 linked wallets; together they created 5 coins we checked.

Coins they created: $GTA$, $MEME, $Trencher, $earth, $Xingxing

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

3 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Other coins in our records tied to this creator through the wallet that first funded it.

Creator wallet Ci39V9wkYj18YswByjb22SDgAugH1KgYty9tG6yh8TyU (from GeckoTerminal). 1 other coin from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

$earthNot scanned yet. – 24d ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 6 h ago.

• Dev-linked<0.1%1 wallet

Held right now by the top 20 holders, by tag. Sniper, bundler and side-wallet tags come from every launch we've read, not this coin alone.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 0.01%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Promises vs the chain1 of 2 promises don't hold: liquidity locked or burned (Only 0% of the pool's liquidity is locked or burned) source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 6 linked wallets; together they created 5 coins we checked. source
• The teamThe dev and 4 early buyer/holder wallets; 1 connected to the dev (funding or crew); their 121 earlier coins with an outcome: 111 fell 80%+, 1 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @allegedlyuncle (verified) with 73 likes. It was posted 11 days before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 9 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (ApZu…pbKg). source
• On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims wallet connection, but its code has no wallet or contract calls. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 84 days before the coin launched. source
• Same ticker elsewhere27 other coins trade as $GTA$. The biggest is GTA memes on Solana ($925K, first pool 2mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. source
• Linked launches2 other coins in our records connect to this creator through funding: $Xingxing (launched by this creator's funder), $Trencher (creator funded by this creator).
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 1 other coin we checked.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/allegedlyuncle/status/2117699447601668365 is also listed by 9 other coins we checked: $GTA$ ×9. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website cyberleek.vilanerios.com is also listed by 8 other coins we checked: $GTA$ ×5, $DCYC ×2, $DYC. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.