$YouTube

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

Trading apps

Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 03 Nov 2026.

The 18 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 88.9% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 2 linked groups hold 88.85% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Groups of wallets that keep buying launch blocks together, across coins we checked. A crew is a buying pattern; it doesn't say who runs it.

7 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet 5GrPSoLHykHAuA1Zgvot5HR98LhzkaSVQohFUpxVCaqf (from GeckoTerminal). 1 other coin from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

1 red1 of 1 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$OpenAINarrativeDev not checked yet; no X account, Telegram or website linked; top 10 hold 100% 29 -99%a day after scan 2d ago

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 2 coins on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 2 of them.
• Cabals in this coin3 known groups of wallets are in this coin. The largest, launch crew #94e351, has 7 of its 7 wallets here: 88.75% bought in the launch block. source
• The teamThe dev and 17 early buyer/holder wallets; 14 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 88.8%; their 324 earlier coins with an outcome: 303 fell 80%+, 6 went 2x+ within a day. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $1.7K, 101.7% of the $1.7K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $17) would get roughly 1.9% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere28 other coins trade as $YouTube. None of them has a pool with real liquidity behind its price. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 1 other coin we checked. Of the 1 with a 24 h outcome, 1 fell 80% or more within a day.

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.