$cat3

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The 2 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 5.16% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 0 linked groups hold 0% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 25 coins we checked; members bought 7 launch blocks.

Coins they created: $PUMPA, $cat3, $cat3, $Refrigerator, $PumpLiquid, $LOUIE, $ZERO, $CRIME, $SI, $TXP, $Long, $DailyCash

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

1 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet CHvzjuXvwjqYytqnJx9bQATjFwQren75BbFdpagdXjPB (from GeckoTerminal). 9 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

9 red

$cat3TechDev not checked yet; tech not tested yet; top 10 hold 94% 31 $37.8Kat scan 6d ago $Refrigerator Refrigerator CoinTechThe dev holds 5.8%; the site backs 1 of 1 tech claims with its own code 37 $41.3Kat scan 7d ago $DailyCashNarrativeReused X account, a relaunch pattern; the same X account is linked by 1 other coin we've seen; top 10 hold 95% 29 $39.0Kat scan 11d ago $byeTechThe dev holds 2.3%; the dev holds 2.3%, nothing against it on record; the website backs 1 of its 2 tech claims 26 $41.1Kat scan 11d ago $Ombra Ombra OSTechSerial launcher: 9 other coins from this dev; tech not tested yet; top 10 hold 99% 30 $41.5Kat scan 11d ago $Ombra Ombra OSTechSerial launcher: 9 other coins from this dev; tech not tested yet; top 10 hold 99% 29 $41.6Kat scan 11d ago $Ombra Ombra OSTechSerial launcher: 9 other coins from this dev; tech not tested yet 33 $41.6Kat scan 11d ago $Deaton Triceratops ProrsusNarrativeThe dev held 5.7% at our scan; top 10 hold 98%; links an X post, not an account 26 $36.7Kat scan 12d ago $cybercoin wipedTechDev wallet is less than a day old; website doesn't show this token's address; top 10 hold 94% 22 $41.0Kat scan 12d ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 29 Oct 2026.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 54.2%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #gabb71, has 6 of its 16 wallets here: 1.1% held at our check. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 25 coins we checked; members bought 7 launch blocks. source
• The teamThe dev and 1 early buyer/holder wallet; 9 earlier coins together, outcomes still coming in. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code; the site shows other addresses (2HhA…fkW1, 66wo…MZML, F7p3…gmNe). source
• On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims on-chain / smart contracts, but its code has no wallet or contract calls. source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 470 days before the coin launched. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 9 other coins we checked.
• Reused X accountThe X account @cat3solana is also listed by 4 other coins we checked: $cat3 ×4. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused Telegram groupThe Telegram group t.me/cat3portal is also listed by 2 other coins we checked: $cat3 ×2. source
• Reused websiteThe website cat3.fun is also listed by 5 other coins we checked: $cat3 ×5. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.