$E/ACC / Effective Accelerationism

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet 9rNPbdpa98TdjZcEEwKXhYQph2aUs1e1Jb193EtDgnee (from GeckoTerminal). 20 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

1 green1 yellow18 red10 of 10 judged fell 80%+ within a day

$APUTechDev's earlier coins: 10 of 10 fell 80%+ within a day; on-chain claim, no wallet code 20 $7.3Kat scan 1h ago $APUTechDev's earlier coins: 10 of 10 fell 80%+ within a day; on-chain claim, no wallet code 21 $9.3Kat scan 1h ago $GATO GTA6CATVampDev's earlier coins: 8 of 8 fell 80%+ within a day; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 16 $7.3Kat scan 7h ago $CF Coinly FansTechDev's earlier coins: 10 of 10 fell 80%+ within a day; website doesn't show this token's address 22 11h ago $WEALTH Wealth CoinNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 7 of 7 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 10 other coins we've seen 25 $9.2Kat scan 15h ago $WEALTH Wealth CoinNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 7 of 7 fell 80%+ within a day; the same X post is linked by 10 other coins we've seen 18 $8.5Kat scan 15h ago $FOMOMONEY Fomo moneyNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 7 of 7 fell 80%+ within a day; no X account, Telegram or website linked 16 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $FOMOMONEY Fomo moneyNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 7 of 7 fell 80%+ within a day; no X account, Telegram or website linked 18 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $FOMOMONEY Fomo moneyNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 7 of 7 fell 80%+ within a day; no X account, Telegram or website linked 16 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $WHITE WHITE MONSTERNarrativeDev's earlier coins: 7 of 7 fell 80%+ within a day; no X account, Telegram or website linked 23 1d ago $APPLEPAIDTechDev's earlier coins: 6 of 6 fell 80%+ within a day; website names another $APPLEPAID 21 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $coinVampDev's earlier coins: 6 of 6 fell 80%+ within a day; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 17 -100%a day after scan 1d ago $coinVampDev's earlier coins: 6 of 6 fell 80%+ within a day; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 17 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $batonVampDev's earlier coins: 7 of 7 fell 80%+ within a day; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 21 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $batonVampThe dev held 90% at our scan; top 10 hold 99%; the same X post is linked by 2 other coins we've seen 16 $70at scan 2d ago $CHOO Choo ChooTechThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; tech not tested yet 64 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $titcoinVampDev's earlier coins: 3 of 3 fell 80%+ within a day; copies the ticker of an older, bigger coin (a vamp) 20 -100%a day after scan 2d ago $WASTEDTechDev's earlier coins: 7 of 7 fell 80%+ within a day; website names another $WASTED 24 4d ago $AMD A Meme DogVampThe dev held none at scan, nothing on record; 6% held by wallets one source paid; the same X post is linked by 36 4d ago $MAMESUKETechDev not checked yet; tech not tested yet 83 -100%a day after scan 4d ago

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 2 h ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Linked holders hold 1.23%. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin2 known groups of wallets are in this coin. The largest, holder guild #g9dfca, has 9 of its 42 wallets here: 5.82% held at our check. 9 of the 9 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• The teamThe dev and 1 early buyer/holder wallet; 1 connected to the dev (funding or crew); their 10 earlier coins with an outcome: 10 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @fate1OO with 9 likes. It was posted 2 days before the coin's first pool. The post doesn't name this coin: the coin borrows its story. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $3 market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $0) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere1 other coin trades as $E/ACC. The biggest is e/acc on elysium ($7.4M, first pool 3d ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. An older coin with the same name (DNGj…pump) had its pool go from $29.1K to $66 20h ago. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 20 other coins we checked. Of the 10 with a 24 h outcome, 10 fell 80% or more within a day.

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.