$MASK / Nullmask
Made by a 21-day-old wallet; 99% of supply went to 4 launch-block wallets; the creator held 79.3% at our scan; mint and freeze revoked; 39 holders, top 10 hold 100%.
DB buy below the candle · DS sell above it · L event · what the letters mean
Who: D dev, F dev's funder, S sniper (launch block), C crew, H top holder, W large trade, SM smart money; named KOLs show initials. Events: L launch block, TG callout, B same-block buys, N fresh wallets. Tap a key above to hide a kind. Facts, not a verdict.Charts by TradingView.
Holder concentration
Top holders mapped by share
Top 10 hold 100% of 39 holders, but the scan only got those totals, not the wallets behind them, so they can't be mapped here.
Deepest pools
Top 5 by liquidity
No pools found yet: the coin may still be on its launch curve.
How we scanned the website
nullmask.io
- 1Opened nullmask.io in our sandboxed browser32 requests in 11s
- 2Read its code 18 scriptsSvelte / SvelteKit, Google tag (gtag.js)
- 3Talks to 1 own host + 1 outside serviceGoogle Analytics / Tag Manager
- 4Wallet code no wallet code
- 5Tech claims 1 of 3 backed by its own code ✗ Trading / swaps / bots✗ Own chain / L2 / ZK✓ A working app / platform
Over time
Liquidity, holders and market cap
Recording started: we read this coin every 10 minutes from now on, and the charts fill in over the next hour.
Money out (what the dev and launch-block wallets sold minus bought in the first 24 hours) is being measured: this updates by itself in a minute.
The launch block, by who paid for it
The 4 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 99.15% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 1 linked group holds 79.31% of it.
| Group | Wallets | Share bought | Taken out (24 h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| The dev's side 4WGd…xGfk | 1 | 79.31% | measuring |
| AMkU…37zn on its own | 1 | 19.84% | measuring |
| 27HF…M3MX on its own sniper | 1 | 0.0% | measuring |
| Fs9R…gNfR on its own sniper | 1 | 0.0% | measuring |
Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.
The team
The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.
| 4WGd…xGfk | dev · 79.3% at scan | 2 earlier coins | |
| 27HF…M3MX | early buyer sniper | 539 earlier coins: 330 fell 80%+, 5 2x+ | |
| Fs9R…gNfR | early buyer sniper | 424 earlier coins: 107 fell 80%+, 1 2x+ | |
| AMkU…37zn | early buyer · 19.8% | 1 earlier coin: 0 fell 80%+, 0 2x+ |
Creator fees
All creator fees go to one wallet: the one that launched the coin.
- 4WGd…xGfk (the deployer)100%
About 0.0005 SOL in creator fees is waiting unclaimed (0 from the bonding curve, 0.0005 from PumpSwap trading).
Read on chain from the coin's pump.fun bonding curve and the creator's PumpSwap fee vault 27 h ago.
Money map
Loading who funded whom…Arrows show money moving (the first money a wallet received) and coins bought or held. Facts from the chain, not a verdict about anyone.
The creator wallet
4WGd3cFNeu5YCQFE5bFfwneHfsPn3JqLsRBSg8GexGfk
- Held 79.31% of the supply and 14.5686 SOL at our scan.
- First transaction 21d ago, 5 transactions so far.
- First funded with 0.648 SOL by FkkD…ynx3.
Source: pump.fun bonding curve.
The creator's other coins
Creator wallet 4WGd3cFNeu5YCQFE5bFfwneHfsPn3JqLsRBSg8GexGfk (from GeckoTerminal). 2 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›
2 red
At a glance
- Mint & freezeRevoked
- Bought in the launch block99.2% by 4 wallets
- Dev held at our scan79.31%
- Creator wallet age21d
- Held by top 10100%
- Website tech claims backed1 of 3
- Socialssite X
Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.
Launch map
The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.
Launch tape (log time from creation)
Live activity
Wallets per minute (in the trades we've read)
Waiting for trades…
buying wallets selling wallets
What we're seeing
- Waiting for trades…
Latest trades
Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)
| Wallet | Bought | Sold | Net | Trades | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for trades… | |||||
Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.
Made by a 21-day-old wallet; 99% of supply went to 4 launch-block wallets; the creator held 79.3% at our scan; mint and freeze revoked; 39 holders, top 10 hold 100%.
- The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; their 358 earlier coins with an outcome: 332 fell 80%+, 6 went 2x+ within a day.
- On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims trading / swaps / bots, but its code has no wallet or contract calls.
- Same ticker elsewhere15 other coins trade as $MASK. The biggest is Mask Network on Ethereum ($37.0M, first pool 69mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. An older coin with the same name (Gzv7…6429) had its pool go from $75.8K to $0 12h ago.
- Reused X accountThe X account @NullMaskio is also listed by 4 other coins we checked: $MASK ×4. It most likely belongs to $MASK, a far bigger coin; this coin is using it.
- Reused websiteThe website nullmask.io is also listed by 3 other coins we checked: $MASK ×3. It most likely belongs to $MASK, a far bigger coin; this coin is using it.
Cross-checks
What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.
- Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 4 coins on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 3 of them.
- The teamThe dev and 3 early buyer/holder wallets; their 358 earlier coins with an outcome: 332 fell 80%+, 6 went 2x+ within a day. source
- On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims trading / swaps / bots, but its code has no wallet or contract calls. source
- Same ticker elsewhere15 other coins trade as $MASK. The biggest is Mask Network on Ethereum ($37.0M, first pool 69mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. An older coin with the same name (Gzv7…6429) had its pool go from $75.8K to $0 12h ago. source
- Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
- Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 2 other coins we checked.
- Reused X accountThe X account @NullMaskio is also listed by 4 other coins we checked: $MASK ×4. It most likely belongs to $MASK, a far bigger coin; this coin is using it. source
- Reused websiteThe website nullmask.io is also listed by 3 other coins we checked: $MASK ×3. It most likely belongs to $MASK, a far bigger coin; this coin is using it. source
The token
Mint & freeze revoked
- Mint new tokens: locked
- Freeze wallets: locked
- Change name, logo and links: locked
The website
1 of 3 tech claims backed
- Trading / swaps / bots: nothing found on the public page
- Own chain / L2 / ZK: nothing found on the public page
- A working app / platform: evidence found
Track record of these signals
How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals
| Signal this coin has | Fell 80%+ with it | Without it | Coins |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20%+ bought in the launch block | 80% | 70% | 896 |
| Creator holds 5%+ | 97% | 67% | 1643 |
| Creator wallet under a day old | 79% | 69% | 2106 |
| Top 10 hold 50%+ | 84% | 66% | 4154 |
| Website tech claims mostly unbacked | 60% | 71% | 667 |
- Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
- "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.