$GTCVI / Grand Titty Coin VI

Solanagraduated 4d ago
Scanned 31 Oct 2026

77% of supply went to 6 launch-block wallets; mint and freeze revoked; 136 holders, top 10 hold 98%.

Price–– 24h
Market cap–
Liquidity–
Volume 24h–
Holders136
Top 10 hold98%
Dev held–
Launch block77%6 wallets
Loading the chart…

    ▲ buy · ▼ sell · ● event. Markers show trades by wallets we know something about (D dev, LB launch-block buyer, C crew, K KOL, S smart money, W large trade, TG callout) and what our live watch flagged. Facts, not a verdict. Charts by TradingView.

    Holder concentration

    Top holders mapped by share

    The scan didn't get a holder list for this coin.

    Deepest pools

    Top 5 by liquidity

    No pools found yet: the coin may still be on its launch curve.

    How we scanned the website

    gtcvi.fun

    Screenshot of gtcvi.fun
    1. 1Opened gtcvi.fun in our sandboxed browser12 requests in 9.3s
    2. 2Read its code 2 scriptsno known framework
    3. 3Talks to 1 own host + 2 outside servicesCloudflare Web Analytics, Google Fonts
    4. 4Wallet code no wallet code · shows this coin's address
    5. 5Tech claims 0 of 2 backed by its own code ✗ On-chain / smart contracts✗ Trading / swaps / bots

    Every finding with its source ›

    Over time

    Liquidity, holders and market cap

    Recording started: we read this coin every 10 minutes from now on, and the charts fill in over the next hour.

    Money out

    SOL the dev and the launch-block wallets took out of the coin in its first 24 hours (sales minus buys, plus liquidity taken back out of a pool minus liquidity put in), grouped by how they're linked.

    $0Taken out (0.0 SOL)
    0Of 3 wallets took out more than they put in
    0Linked groups that took money out
    0.0 / 0.0Liquidity taken out / added (SOL)
    GroupWalletsBoughtSoldLiquidity in / outNet
    Wallets paid by BmFd…ymy6218.11 SOL0.00 SOL0.0 / 0.0-18.11 SOL · $-1,675

    Still inside the first 24 hours: updated every 15 minutes. Counts trades from each wallet's own token account for this coin (up to 25 each). Tokens passed to another wallet and sold there only count if that wallet is in the set. Liquidity added to or taken out of a pool is counted separately from buys and sells. Dollars at today's SOL price ($92). Measured 03 Nov 2026.

    Footprints

    How the launch buyers and top holders traded this coin (which app, which fee settings) and where the top holders' money came from. Read from each wallet's first trade of this coin.

    2Wallets read (of 6)
    2Different trading apps or routes
    noneBiggest same-fee group (wallets · supply)
    0%Top-holder supply paid by wallets in this coin

    Trading apps

    App or routeWalletsSupply
    App with fee wallet G5UZ…69dP144.78%
    Direct (no app fee seen)10.58%

    Apps are named only when the trade itself shows it (an account or program carrying the app's name, e.g. GMGN, Axiom, Jupiter); otherwise we show the wallet the trade paid a 0.1–3% fee to, or the program it went through. Priority fee = transaction fee minus the 5,000-lamport base per signature; a fee seen in 20+ other coins is marked as a common default. Exchanges are named only from our label book; a funder with 1,000 transactions in under a day is a busy hot wallet (exchange, swap service or bot). Facts, not part of the light. Measured 03 Nov 2026.

    The launch block, by who paid for it

    The 6 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 76.93% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 2 linked groups hold 76.24% of it.

    Paid by iGdF…Sdwu: 53.69%Paid by BmFd…ymy6: 22.55%On its own: 0.58%On its own: 0.11%
    GroupWalletsShare boughtTaken out (24 h)
    Paid by iGdF…Sdwu 253.69% ·
    Paid by BmFd…ymy6 222.55% -18.11 SOL · $-1,675
    6Z91…VtAb on its own 10.58% ·
    EtXK…ActB on its own 10.11% +0.00 SOL · $0

    Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

    The team

    The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

    6Wallets in the team
    0Connected to the dev
    ·Earlier coins that fell 80%+
    ·Earlier coins that went 2x+
    EtXK…ActB dev no earlier coins seen
    6Z91…VtAb early buyer · 0.6% 2 earlier coins
    3HDL…rcSC early buyer · 44.8% no earlier coins seen
    9VLe…Psba early buyer · 16.8% no earlier coins seen
    FBka…4u8t early buyer · 8.9% no earlier coins seen
    EfyV…gjJn early buyer · 5.8% no earlier coins seen

    Creator fees

    All creator fees go to one wallet: the one that launched the coin.

    Read on chain from the coin's pump.fun bonding curve and the creator's PumpSwap fee vault 6 h ago.

    Money map

    Loading who funded whom…

    Arrows show money moving (the first money a wallet received) and coins bought or held. Facts from the chain, not a verdict about anyone.

    The launch block

    6 wallets bought 76.9% of the supply in the same block the coin was created (or the next one). Many buyers there usually means a scripted, "bundled" launch.

    3HDL…rcSC44.78%
    9VLe…Psba16.78%
    FBka…4u8t8.91%
    EfyV…gjJn5.77%
    6Z91…VtAb0.58%
    EtXK…ActB0.11%

    Repeat launch buyers

    1 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

    6Z91…VtAb2 other launches GJam… JDar…

    The creator's other coins

    Creator wallet EtXKMAhYDEAB892MU6mZKBy514YmVZZVWv1uPVnvActB (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

    At a glance

    • Mint & freezeRevoked
    • Bought in the launch block76.9% by 6 wallets
    • Held by top 1098%
    • Website tech claims backed0 of 2
    • Socialssite Telegram

    Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.

    Launch map

    The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet. Linked buyers took 76.24% of the supply.

    • 2 launch buyers (53.69% of supply) were first funded by iGdF…Sdwu.
    • 2 launch buyers (22.55% of supply) were first funded by BmFd…ymy6.

    Launch tape (log time from creation)

    Created Launch block 77% · 6 wallets · +0s Graduated +3m Our check $39.2K · +4m 24 h later $1.9K · +24h Now +4d

    Live activity

    Connecting to the live trades…

    What we're seeing

    • Waiting for trades…

    Latest trades

    Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)

    WalletBoughtSoldNetTrades
    Waiting for trades…

    Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.

    77% of supply went to 6 launch-block wallets; mint and freeze revoked; 136 holders, top 10 hold 98%.

    • On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims on-chain / smart contracts, but its code has no wallet or contract calls.
    • Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive had no saved copy of the site (asked 4 days ago): it is probably as new as the coin.

    Cross-checks

    What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

    • Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 1 coin on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 1 of them.
    • Money outThe dev and 2 launch-block wallets put in more SOL than they took out in the first 24 hours. source
    • The teamThe dev and 5 early buyer/holder wallets; 2 earlier coins together, outcomes still coming in. source
    • Website shows this token's addressThe token's address appears on its website or in the site's code. source
    • On-chain claim, no wallet codeThe site claims on-chain / smart contracts, but its code has no wallet or contract calls. source
    • Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive had no saved copy of the site (asked 4 days ago): it is probably as new as the coin.
    • Reused Telegram groupThe Telegram group t.me/GrandTittyCoinVI is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $GTCVI. source
    • Reused websiteThe website gtcvi.fun is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $GTCVI. source

    The token

    Mint & freeze revoked

    • Mint new tokens: locked
    • Freeze wallets: locked
    • Change name, logo and links: locked
    Full token report

    The website

    0 of 2 tech claims backed

    • On-chain / smart contracts: nothing found on the public page
    • Trading / swaps / bots: nothing found on the public page
    Full website report

    Track record of these signals

    How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

    Signal this coin hasFell 80%+ with itWithout itCoins
    20%+ bought in the launch block82%60%548
    Top 10 hold 50%+78%55%2879
    Launch buyers that buy many launches67%60%888
    Website tech claims mostly unbacked60%61%426
    • Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
    • "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.