$Copper

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 154 coins we checked, and 27 of 52 with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day; members bought 11 launch blocks.

Coins they created: $Encryption, $Encryption, $Inuween, $LEGO, $LEGO, $Copper, $Copper, $Copper, $Copper, $Copper, $Copper, $Copper

Linked when one first funded the other, or both bought in the same small launch crew. Busy wallets (exchanges, services) are never used to join wallets.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet 7EXoi35Kuj9MSzAggsUBWgThBrtp2ppEsjwQqVMRk1Ke (from GeckoTerminal). We've checked 49 other coins from it:

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, RugCheck's insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 0.0%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, holder guild #g637ed, has 7 of its 48 wallets here: 10.99% held at our check. 26 of the 59 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• Linked walletsThe dev is one of 3 linked wallets; together they created 154 coins we checked, and 27 of 52 with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day; members bought 11 launch blocks. source
• The teamThe dev and 0 early buyer/holder wallets; their 51 earlier coins with an outcome: 27 fell 80%+, 17 went 2x+ within a day. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @AgentM_Tech with 13 likes. The post names this coin. 10 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Same ticker elsewhere5 other coins trade as $Copper. None of them has a pool with real liquidity behind its price. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 153 other coins we checked. Of the 51 with a 24 h outcome, 27 fell 80% or more within a day.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/AgentM_Tech/status/2100978953586409935 is also listed by 10 other coins we checked: $COPPER, $Copper, $Copper, $Copper…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.