$ALICE / Alice Huang

Groups of wallets that keep buying the same coins: launch crews (they buy launch blocks together) and holder guilds (they sit among the top holders of the same coins). Only groups with 2+ wallets in this coin.

The 11 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 49.85% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 2 linked groups hold 24.29% of it.

Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Groups of wallets that keep buying launch blocks together, across coins we checked. A crew is a buying pattern; it doesn't say who runs it.

6 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

Creator wallet CtVS1e9MQ4sMybPbuUS4f9ctUvvB6vLaXZQpaz2tigq4 (from GeckoTerminal). No other coins from this wallet in our records yet. Open the wallet ›

Who each of the biggest holders is to this launch, from the launch block, first funding, insider flags, known groups and each wallet's first trade.

Source RugCheck, read 47 min ago.

The 20 biggest holders (bigger bubble = bigger share). Grey: pools and known services. Pink: wallets RugCheck flags as insiders. Same colour with a line to an outer dot: first funded by the same wallet. Liquidity locked: 100%.

Holders, insider flags, labels and liquidity locks: RugCheck. Shared funders: our own read of each wallet's first transaction.

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet. Linked buyers took 23.81% of the supply.

• 3 launch buyers (23.81% of supply) were first funded by 9sQ9…yYxx.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• Creator's launchesThe creator wallet has launched 1 coin on pump.fun (counted on chain from its bonding curves); we checked 1 of them.
• Cabals in this coin1 known group of wallets is in this coin. The largest, launch crew #1cc6b0, has 5 of its 516 wallets here: 0.48% bought in the launch block. 292 of the 356 coins it was in with an outcome fell 80%+ within a day. source
• The teamThe dev and 11 early buyer/holder wallets; 5 connected to the dev (funding or crew), holding 0.5%; their 143 earlier coins with an outcome: 114 fell 80%+, 1 went 2x+ within a day. source
• Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $2.2K, 109.5% of the $2.0K market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $20) would get roughly 1.8% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
• Same ticker elsewhere24 other coins trade as $ALICE. The biggest is The Nvidia Spy on Solana ($118K, first pool 2d ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. An older coin with the same name (AFgr…33M1) had its pool go from $16.7K to $0 43m ago. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/esotericpigeon/status/2119616831702905155 is also listed by 1 other coin we checked: $ALICE. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.