$LUCKY / LuckyCoin

Solana3h oldgraduated 3h ago
Scanned 3 h ago

Trading for 3h; 20% of supply went to 3 launch-block wallets; mint and freeze revoked.

Price$0.0₆1320no real move
Market cap$132no real pool
Liquidity$01 pool
Volume 24h$287K
Holders–
Top 10 hold–
Dev held–
Launch block20%3 wallets
Loading the chart…
    DB buy below the candle · DS sell above it · L event · what the letters mean Who: D dev, F dev's funder, S sniper (launch block), C crew, H top holder, W large trade, SM smart money; named KOLs show initials. Events: L launch block, TG callout, B same-block buys, N fresh wallets. Tap a key above to hide a kind. Facts, not a verdict.

    Charts by TradingView.

    Holder concentration

    Top holders mapped by share

    The scan didn't get a holder list for this coin.

    Deepest pools

    Top 1 by liquidity

    Bar = share of all liquidity across the coin's pools. Pools from DexScreener.

    Over time

    Liquidity, holders and market cap

    Recording started: we read this coin every 10 minutes from now on, and the charts fill in over the next hour.

    What we've flagged

    Flagged 4 times in 7 days
    1. 3 h agoLightLight changed from yellow to red (score 32).
    2. 3 h agoLiquidityLiquidity fell 100% ($16.2K → $0): pulled, or a very large sale.
    3. 3 h agoCap downMarket cap fell 100% ($64.3K → $0).
    4. 3 h agoGraduatedLeft its launch curve: trading moved to a pool.

    Moments our alert rules fired, kept for 14 days, even when nobody tracks the coin. Facts about the coin, not a light.

    Money out (what the dev and launch-block wallets sold minus bought in the first 24 hours) is being measured: this updates by itself in a minute.

    Footprints (trading apps, fee settings and where the top holders' money came from) are being measured: this updates by itself in a minute.

    The launch block, by who paid for it

    The 3 wallets that bought in the launch block (the first two blocks, under a second) took 19.95% of the supply. Grouped by the wallet that first funded them: 0 linked groups hold 0% of it.

    On its own: 19.95%On its own: 0.0%On its own: 0.0%
    GroupWalletsShare boughtTaken out (24 h)
    8jMk…1Q3c on its own 119.95% measuring
    PYUx…k1iU on its own sniper 10.0% measuring
    2Wpe…p93t on its own sniper 10.0% measuring

    Grey = a wallet with no funding link to the others. Taken out = sales minus buys plus liquidity out minus in, from the money-out measurement above.

    The team

    The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

    3Wallets in the team
    0Connected to the dev
    100%Earlier coins that fell 80%+
    0%Earlier coins that went 2x+
    2Wpe…p93t early buyer sniper 945 earlier coins: 20 fell 80%+, 0 2x+
    PYUx…k1iU early buyer sniper 188 earlier coins
    8jMk…1Q3c early buyer · 19.9% no earlier coins seen

    Money map

    Loading who funded whom…

    Arrows show money moving (the first money a wallet received) and coins bought or held. Facts from the chain, not a verdict about anyone.

    The launch block

    3 wallets bought 19.9% of the supply in the same block the coin was created (or the next one). Many buyers there usually means a scripted, "bundled" launch.

    8jMk…1Q3c19.95%
    PYUx…k1iU0.00%
    2Wpe…p93t0.00%

    Repeat launch buyers

    2 of the wallets that bought this coin's launch block also bought the launch block of other coins we checked. Sniper bots and launch groups both look like this.

    2Wpe…p93t945 other launches 11jJ… 1ydW… 21ds… 21f3…
    PYUx…k1iU188 other launches 25EY… 2DGo… 2Dap… 2KNv…

    At a glance

    • Mint & freezeRevoked
    • Bought in the launch block19.9% by 3 wallets
    • SocialsX

    Facts read from the chain and the coin's own pages. Checked isn't the same as safe.

    Launch map

    The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

    Launch tape (log time from creation)

    Created Launch block 20% · 3 wallets · +0s Our check $0 · +3m Now $132 · +4h

    Live activity

    Connecting to the live trades…

    Wallets per minute (in the trades we've read)

    Waiting for trades…

    buying wallets selling wallets

    What we're seeing

    • Waiting for trades…

    Latest trades

    Most active wallets (in the trades we've read)

    WalletBoughtSoldNetTrades
    Waiting for trades…

    Trades from GeckoTerminal's public feed, refreshed every few seconds while this page is open. Wallet ages and funders: our own reads of each wallet's first transaction. Flags describe what happened, not why.

    Trading for 3h; 20% of supply went to 3 launch-block wallets; mint and freeze revoked.

    • The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; their 20 earlier coins with an outcome: 20 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day.
    • Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $132 market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $1) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool).
    • Same ticker elsewhere26 other coins trade as $LUCKY. The biggest is B-Lucky on BNB Chain ($1.6M, first pool 12mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant.

    Cross-checks

    What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

    • The teamThe dev and 2 early buyer/holder wallets; their 20 earlier coins with an outcome: 20 fell 80%+, 0 went 2x+ within a day. source
    • The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @notsuted (verified) with 40 likes. It was posted 32 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 3 other coins we checked use the same post. source
    • Liquidity depthPool liquidity is $0, 0.0% of the $132 market cap. Selling 1% of the supply (about $1) would get roughly 100.0% less than the quoted price (estimate for a standard pool). source
    • Same ticker elsewhere26 other coins trade as $LUCKY. The biggest is B-Lucky on BNB Chain ($1.6M, first pool 12mo ago). It is older and bigger than this one, so check you have the address you meant. source
    • Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
    • Reused X postThe X post x.com/notsuted/status/2118866747516129311 is also listed by 3 other coins we checked: $LUCKY ×3. 2 of them came earlier. source

    The token

    Mint & freeze revoked

    • Mint new tokens: locked
    • Freeze wallets: locked
    • Change name, logo and links: locked
    Full token report

    The website

    The token's metadata lists no website of its own.

    The story behind it

    @notsuted verified · 40 likes · 19 replies

    DOGE WAS MADE FROM LUCKYCOIN. 13 YEARS LATER, LUCKYCOIN JUST GOT ITS CAT $LUCKY "13 YEARS OF GOOD LUCK FOR THOSE WHO DON'T IGNORE THE LITTLE KITTEN" 150+ "don't ignore for good luck" posts this year. 48M views. Mostly cats. This kitten is the biggest one this week TLDR: 1. https://t.co/p7uaDpfM4f

    Posted 32 min before the coin's first pool. The post names this coin. 3 other coins we checked use the same post.

    Track record of these signals

    How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

    Signal this coin hasFell 80%+ with itWithout itCoins
    Launch buyers that buy many launches69%68%1044
    Loads DexScreener's chart in this page (their site sets its own cookies).
    • Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
    • "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.