$ECHOTRIB / ECHOTRIBBLE

The dev, the wallets that bought the launch block, and holders the dev funded: how they're connected and how their earlier coins did. The launch map below draws the connections.

Creator wallet FJpU7yDWqsD2ADJR6rVqREB3vTWKx5yh4XupEQLbvj6e (from GeckoTerminal). 7 other coins from it in our records: Open the wallet ›

2 yellow3 red

$ECHOTRIB ECHOTRIBBLETechThe dev holds 91%; the website backs 0 of its 1 tech claims with its own code 35 $21.3Kat scan 14d ago $ECHOTRIB ECHOTRIBBLETechThe dev holds 94%; the website backs 0 of its 1 tech claims with its own code 35 $9.3Kat scan 14d ago $ECHOTRIB ECHOTRIBBLETechThe dev holds 89%; the website backs 0 of its 1 tech claims with its own code 35 $11.1Kat scan 14d ago $RIPPEDNot scanned yet. – $13.2Kat scan 15d ago $ONEPIECE One PieceNot scanned yet. – $9.8Kat scan 15d ago $BULLYTechThe dev sold out, nothing against it on record; the website backs 0 of its 1 tech claims with its own code 43 $104at scan 15d ago $BULLYTechThe dev sold out, nothing against it on record; the website backs 0 of its 1 tech claims with its own code 43 $104at scan 15d ago

The creator in the middle, the wallets that bought in the launch block around it (bigger bubble = bigger share of supply), and the wallets that funded them on the outside. Buyers with the same colour were funded by the same wallet.

What we find when we compare the coin's website, code, token, launch timing, liquidity, ticker and wallets against each other and against public address labels.

• The teamThe dev and 0 early buyer/holder wallets; 7 earlier coins together, outcomes still coming in. source
• The story behind itThe coin's story is an X post by @WagonDevs (verified) with 33 likes. The post names this coin. 9 other coins we checked use the same post. source
• Website doesn't show this token's addressThe token's address doesn't appear on its website or in the site's code. source
• AI claim, no AI calls seenThe site claims AI, but none of its pages called an AI service while we watched (it may run on its own servers). source
• Website age vs launchThe Internet Archive first saved the site 8845 days before the coin launched. source
• Contract permissions (GoPlus)GoPlus finds none of the risky permissions it checks for. source
• Creator's earlier coinsThis creator launched 7 other coins we checked.
• Reused X postThe X post x.com/WagonDevs/status/2112417170265137569 is also listed by 9 other coins we checked: $ECHOTRIBBLE, $ECHOTRIBBL, $ECHOTRBBLE, $ECHOTRIB…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source
• Reused websiteThe website gizmodo.com is also listed by 12 other coins we checked: $ECHOTRIBBLE, $ECHOTRIBBLE, $ECHOTRI, $ECHOTRIBBL…. So many coins list it that it's most likely someone else's, borrowed for the story. source

How earlier coins with the same signals did: the share that fell 80% or more within 24 hours of our check, against coins without the signal. It describes past coins; it doesn't predict this one. All signals

• Checked isn't the same as safe: these checks describe what the token allows and what the website runs, not what anyone will do.
• "Nothing found" means not visible on the public page; servers and private code are invisible to us. Not financial advice.